案例教案成果tpo053the cambrian explosion_第1页
案例教案成果tpo053the cambrian explosion_第2页
案例教案成果tpo053the cambrian explosion_第3页
案例教案成果tpo053the cambrian explosion_第4页
案例教案成果tpo053the cambrian explosion_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩3页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

TheCambrianThegeologictimescaleismarkedbysignificantgeologicandbiologicalevents,includingtheoriginofEarthabout4.6billionyearsago,theoriginoflifeabout3.5billionyearsago,theoriginofeukaryoticlife-forms(livingthingsthathavecellswithtruenuclei)about1.5billionyearsago,andtheoriginofanimalsabout0.6billionyearsago.ThelasteventmarksthebeginningoftheCambrianperiod.AnimalsoriginatedrelativelylateinthehistoryofEarth—inonlythelast10percentofEarth’shistory.Duringageologicallybrief100-million-yearperiod,allmodernanimalgroups(alongwithotheranimalsthatarenowextinct)evolved.Thisrapidoriginanddiversificationofanimalsisoftenreferredtoas“theCambrianexplosion.”Scientistshaveaskedimportantquestionsaboutthisexplosionformorethanacentury.WhydiditoccursolateinthehistoryofEarth?Theoriginofmulticellularformsoflifeseemsarelativelysimplestepcomparedtotheoriginoflifeitself.Whydoesthefossilrecordnottheseriesofevolutionarychangesduringtheevolutionofanimals?Whydidanimallifeevolvesoquickly?Paleontologistscontinuetosearchthefossilrecordforanswerstothesequestions.Oneinterpretationregardingtheabsenceoffossilsduringthisimportant100-million-yearperiodisthatearlyanimalsweresoftbodiedandsimplydidnotfossilize.Fossilizationofsoft-bodiedanimalsislesslikelythanfossilizationofhard-bodiedanimals,butitdoesoccur.Conditionsthatpromotefossilizationofsoft-bodiedanimalsincludeveryrapidcoveringbysedimentsthatcreateanenvironmentthatdiscourages position.Infact,fossilbedscontainingsoft-bodiedanimalshavebeenknownformanyyears.TheEdiacarafossilformation,whichcontainstheoldestknownanimalfossils,consistsexclusivelyofsoft-bodiedforms.AlthoughnamedafterasiteinAustralia,theEdiacaraformationisworldwideindistributionanddatestoPrecambriantimes.This700-million-year-oldformationgivesfewcluestotheoriginsofmodernanimals,however,becausepaleontologistsbelieveitrepresentsanevolutionaryexperimentthatfailed.Itcontainsnoancestorsofmodernanimalgroups.AslightlyyoungerfossilformationcontaininganimalremainsistheTommotianformation,namedafteralocaleinRussia.ItdatestotheveryearlyCambrianperiod,anditalsocontainsonlysoft-bodiedforms.Atonetime,theanimalspresentinthesefossilbedswereassignedtovariousmodernanimalgroups,butmostpaleontologistsnowagreethatallTommotianfossilsrepresentuniquebodyformsthataroseintheearlyCambrianperiodanddisappearedbeforetheendoftheperiod,leavingnodescendantsinmodernanimalAthirdfossilformationcontainingbothsoft-bodiedandhard-bodiedanimalsprovidesevidenceoftheresultoftheCambrianexplosion.Thisfossilformation,calledtheBurgessShale,isinYohoNationalParkintheCanadianRockyMountainsofBritishColumbia.ShortlyaftertheCambrianexplosion,mudslidesrapidlyburiedthousandsofmarineanimalsunderconditionsthatfavoredfossilization.Thesefossilbedsprovideevidenceofabout32modernanimalgroups,plusabout20otheranimalbodyformsthataresodifferentfromanymodernanimalsthattheycannotbeassignedtoanyoneofthemoderngroups.TheseunassignableanimalsincludealargeswimmingpredatorcalledAnomalocarisandasoft-bodiedanimalcalledWiwaxia,whichatedetritusoralgae.TheBurgessShaleformationalsohasfossilsofmanyextinctrepresentativesofmodernanimalgroups.Forexample,awell-knownBurgessShaleanimalcalledSidneyiaisarepresentativeofapreviouslyunknowngroupofarthropods(acategoryofanimalsthatincludesinsects,spiders,mites,andcrabs).FossilformationsliketheBurgessShaleshowthatevolutioncannotalwaysbethoughtofasaslowprogression.TheCambrianexplosioninvolvedrapidevolutionarydiversification,followedbytheextinctionofmanyuniqueanimals.Whywasthisevolutionsorapid?Noonereallyknows.Manyzoologistsbelievethatitwasbecausesomanyecologicalnicheswereavailablewithvirtuallynocompetitionfromexistingspecies.WillzoologistseverknowtheevolutionarysequencesintheCambrianexplosion?Perhapsanotherancientfossilbedofsoft-bodiedanimalsfrom600-million-year-oldseasisawaitingdiscovery.Paragraph1:Thegeologictimescaleismarkedbysignificantgeologicandbiologicalevents,includingtheoriginofEarthabout4.6billionyearsago,theoriginoflifeabout3.5billionyearsago,theoriginofeukaryoticlife-forms(livingthingsthathavecellswithtruenuclei)about1.5billionyearsago,andtheoriginofanimalsabout0.6billionyearsago.ThelasteventmarksthebeginningoftheCambrianperiod.AnimalsoriginatedrelativelylateinthehistoryofEarth—inonlythelast10percentofEarth’shistory.Duringageologicallybrief100-million-yearperiod,allmodernanimalgroups(alongwithotheranimalsthatarenowextinct)evolved.Thisrapidoriginanddiversificationofanimalsisoftenreferredtoas“theCambrianexplosion.”Theword“significant”inthepassageisclosestinmeaningTheword“relatively”inthepassageisclosestinmeaningTheword“diversification”inthepassageisclosestinmeaningemergenceofmanysteadydeclineingradualincreaseinbodysuddenParagraph2:Scientistshaveaskedimportantquestionsaboutthisexplosionformorethanacentury.WhydiditoccursolateinthehistoryofEarth?Theoriginofmulticellularformsoflifeseemsarelativelysimplestepcomparedtotheoriginoflifeitself.Whydoesthefossilrecordnottheseriesofevolutionarychangesduringtheevolutionofanimals?Whydidanimallifeevolvesoquickly?Paleontologistscontinuetosearchthefossilrecordforanswerstothesequestions.Theperioddiscussedinthepassageisreferredtoasan“explosion”becauseoccurred0.6billionyearsago,lateinEarth’swascharacterizedbytheunusuallyfastevolutionofmanynewlife-wascharacterizedbywidespreadanimalwascharacterizedbyviolentvolcanicAccordingtoParagraph2,whichofthefollowingisNOTaquestionthatpaleontologistsaskedabouttheCambrianexplosion?WhywastheoriginoflifeasimplestepinEarth’sWhydidittakesolongformulticellularorganismstoWhydidanimallifeevolvesoWhydoesthefossilrecordlackevidenceofanimalevolutionduringthatWhichofthefollowingbestdescribestherelationshipbetweenparagraph2andparagraph3?Paragraph2putsforwardseveralscientificclaims,oneofwhichisrejectedinparagraph3.Paragraph2posesseveralquestions,andparagraph3offersapossibleanswertooneofthem.Paragraph2presentsoutdatedtraditionalviews,whileparagraph3presentsthecurrentscientificconclusions.Paragraph2introducesageneralizationthatisillustratedbyspecificexamplesinparagraph3.Paragraph3:Oneinterpretationregardingtheabsenceoffossilsduringthisimportant100-million-yearperiodisthatearlyanimalsweresoftbodiedandsimplydidnotfossilize.Fossilizationofsoft-bodiedanimalsislesslikelythanfossilizationofhard-bodiedanimals,butitdoesoccur.Conditionsthatpromotefossilizationofsoft-bodiedanimalsincludeveryrapidcoveringbysedimentsthatcreateanenvironmentthatdiscourages Infact,fossilbedscontainingsoft-bodiedanimalshavebeenknownformanyyears.Theword“promote”inthepassageisclosestinmeaningParagraph4:TheEdiacarafossilformation,whichcontainstheoldestknownanimalfossils,consistsexclusivelyofsoft-bodiedforms.AlthoughnamedafterasiteinAustralia,theEdiacaraformationisworldwideindistributionanddatestoPrecambriantimes.This700-million-year-oldformationgivesfewcluestotheoriginsofmodernanimals,however,becausepaleontologistsbelieveitrepresentsanevolutionaryexperimentthatfailed.Itcontainsnoancestorsofmodernanimalgroups.WhichofthefollowingisNOTmentionedinparagraph4asbeingtrueoftheEdiacaraformation?ItcontainsfossilsthatdatebacktothePrecambrianItcontainsonlysoft-bodiedanimalItislocatedonasinglesiteinItdoesnotcontainanyfossilsoftheancestorsofmodernParagraph5:AslightlyyoungerfossilformationcontaininganimalremainsistheTommotianformation,namedafteralocaleinRussia.ItdatestotheveryearlyCambrianperiod,anditalsocontainsonlysoft-bodiedforms.Atonetime,theanimalspresentinthesefossilbedswereassignedtovariousmodernanimalgroups,butmostpaleontologistsnowagreethatallTommotianfossilsrepresentuniquebodyformsthataroseintheearlyCambrianperiodanddisappearedbeforetheendoftheperiod,leavingnodescendantsinmodernanimalgroups.Whichofthesentencesbelowbestexpressestheessentialinformationinthehighlightedsentenceinthepassage?Incorrectchoiceschangethemeaninginimportantwaysorleaveoutessentialinformation.TheanimalsfoundintheTommotianfossilbedwereoncethoughttobelongtoavarietyofmodernanimalgroups,butnowtheyarethoughttohavedescendedfromasinglegroup.AnimalsintheTommotianfossilbedswereinitiallyassignedtomodernanimalgroupsbutarenowthoughttobelongtogroupsthatemergedanddiedoutduringtheCambrianperiod.Thoughatfirsttheythoughtotherwise,paleontologistsnowagreethattheanimalsintheTommotianhavebodyformsfromwhichmodernanimalshavedescended.ItisunclearwhethertheTommotianfossilsfromtheearlyCambrianperiodrepresentuniquebodyformsorwhethertheyshouldbeassignedtovariousmodernanimalgroups.Paragraph6:Athirdfossilformationcontainingbothsoft-bodiedandhard-animalsprovidesevidenceoftheresultoftheCambrianexplosion.Thisfossilformation,calledtheBurgessShale,isinYohoNationalParkintheCanadianRockyMountainsofBritishColumbia.ShortlyaftertheCambrianexplosion,mudslidesrapidlyburiedthousandsofmarineanimalsunderconditionsthatfavoredfossilization.Thesefossilbedsprovideevidenceofabout32modernanimalgroups,plusabout20otheranimalbodyformsthataresodifferentfromanymodernanimalsthattheycannotbeassignedtoanyoneofthemoderngroups.TheseunassignableanimalsincludealargeswimmingpredatorcalledAnomalocarisandasoft-bodiedanimalcalledWiwaxia,whichatedetritusoralgae.TheBurgessShaleformationalsohasfossilsofmanyextinctrepresentativesofmodernanimalgroups.Forexample,awell-knownBurgessShaleanimalcalledSidneyiaisarepresentativeofapreviouslyunknowngroupofarthropods(acategoryofanimalsthatincludesinsects,spiders,mites,andcrabs).Whydoestheauthormention“Anomalocans”andTocontrastpredatorswithanimalsthateatntssuchasToquestiontheeffectsofrapidmudslidesonTosuggestthatmuchisstillunknownaboutanimalsfoundintheBurgessToprovideexamplesoffossilsthatcannotbeassignedtoamodernanimal“Sidneyia”isanexamplearelativeofAnomalocarisandapreviouslyunknownBurgessShaleanextinctmemberofacurrentlyexistingcategoryofananimalthatcannotbeassignedtoanymodernanimalParagraph7:FossilformationsliketheBurgessShaleshowthatevolutioncannotalwaysbethoughtofasaslowprogression.TheCambrianexplosioninvolvedrapidevolutionarydiversification,followedbytheextinctionofmanyuniqueanimals.Whywasthisevolutionsorapid?Noonereallyknows.Manyzoologistsbelievethatitwasbecausesomanyecologicalnicheswereavailablewithvirtuallynocompetitionfromexistingspecies.WillzoologistseverknowtheevolutionarysequencesintheCambrianexplosion?Perhapsanotherancientfossilbedofsoft-bodiedanimalsfrom600-million-year-oldseasisawaitingdiscovery.Whatcanbeinferredfromparagraph7aboutwhytheCambrianexplosionissoItwasaperiodofrapidevolution,andevolutionisoftenthoughtofasaslowItisaperiodwhoseevolutionarysequencesareclearlyItgeneratedaverylargenumberofancientfossilbedscontainingsoft-bodied100-million-yearperiodisthatearlyanimalsweresoftbodiedandsimplydidnotFossilizationofsoft-bodiedanimalsislesslikelythanfossilizationofhard-bodiedanimals,butitdoesoccur.■Conditionsthatpromotefossilizationofsoft-bodiedanimalsincludeveryrapidcoveringbysedimentsthatcreateanenvironmentthatdiscouragesposition.■Infact,fossilbedscontainingsoft-bodiedanimalshavebeenknownformanyyears.Lookatthefoursquares[■]thatindicatewherethefollowingsentencecouldbeaddedtothepassage.Itisrelativelyrarebecausethefossilizationofsoft-bodiedanimalsrequiresaspecialenvironment.WherecouldthesentencebestDirections:Anintroductorysentenceforabriefsummaryofthepassageisprovidedbelow.CompletethesummarybyselectingtheTHREEanswerchoicesthatexpressthemostimportantideasinthepassage.Someanswerchoicesdonotbelonginthesummarybecausetheyexpressideasthatarenotpresentedinthepassageorareminorideasinthepassage.Thisquestionisworth2points.Theterm“Cambrianexplosion”referstothegeologicallybriefperiodduringwhichmodernanimalgroups●●●AnswerLittleisknownaboutthestagesofevolutionduringtheCambrianper

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论