2015年11月7日sat考试机经预测之写作

心，思考，做一个兼收并蓄的人。NormanConquest，PetertheGreat，FitzgeraldThereisalwaysa“however”.Eachsituationhasitsbenefitsanddrawbacks.Inthefieldofmarketfinance,wefindacompellingexamplethatsupportsthisAlthoughitisgoodtostandoutandmakeone’sowndecision,sometimesitisbeneficialtotaketheadviceofothers.WecanseethroughthedemiseofKingLearthatheshouldnothaveignoredKent’swarningtonotdisownCordelia.TheignominiousloseofSwedenintheGreatNorthernWaralsodemonstratethatothersshouldlistentohisadvisers.点明自己的观点。因为SAT考官判卷的时间每篇不超过2分钟，因此，让考官一开始说到这里，上面的两种方式哪种会更好点呢?从议的来说，观点的客观性是不能忽用在SAT开头段写法。仔细的分析下SAT写作，一般来说我们会把题目分为十大类分别是失败成功、权把2015年11月7日的一道拿出来剖析一下，这样对于例子的积累相对来说就会没那FritzFritzHaber,NobelChemistPrizelaureate,whodidnotfollowtheopinionofthecrowdsnorthegeneralopinion.FritzHaber,tookpartinmanufacturingchemicalweaponsuchastoxicgasesduringtheWorldWarI.NobelChemistPrizelaureate化学奖得Hedidnotfollowtheopinionofthecrowdsnorthegeneral这句话让我们知道当选择时他并没有从众，如果大家对FritzHaber有了解的话，应该也都知道他的选择也让他妻子而亡。那FritzHaber例子的这一部分又可以适用于个人选择、。FritzHaber,tookpartinmanufacturingchemicalweaponsuchastoxicgasesduringtheworldwarI.2015117SATFollowingtheCrowdDopeopleneedtocomparethemselveswithothersinordertoappreciatewhattheyhave?Arewidelyheldviewsoftenwrong,oraresuchviewsmorelikelytobeIsthereanyvalueforpeopletobelongonlytoagrouporgroupswithwhichtheyhavesomethingincommon?Isitalwaysbesttodetermineone'sownviewsofrightandwrong,orcanwebenefitfromfollowingthecrowd?IsitmorevaluableforpeopletofitinthantobeuniqueandArepeoplemorelikelytobeproductiveandsuccessfulwhentheyignoretheopinionsofothers?FollowingAuthorityShouldwepaymoreattentiontopeoplewhoareolderandmoreexperiencedthanweare?Shouldsocietylimitpeople'sexposuretosomekindsofinformationorformsofCanagroupofpeoplefunctioneffectivelywithoutsomeonebeinginIsitimportanttoquestiontheideasanddecisionsofpeopleinpositionsofShouldsocietylimitpeople'sexposuretosomekindsofinformationorformsofIseducationprimarilytheresultofinfluencesotherthanShouldschoolshelpstudentsunderstandmoralchoicesandsocialSelf-DeterminationandSuccessisidentitysomethingpeoplearebornwithorgiven,orisitsomethingpeoplecreateforthemselves?Isitbestforpeopletoacceptwhotheyareandwhattheyhave,orshouldpeoplealwaysstrivetobetterthemselves?Dosuccessandhappinessdependonthechoicespeoplemakeratherthanonfactorsbeyondtheircontrol?ArepeoplemorelikelytobehappyiftheyfocusongoalsotherthantheirownIsitmoreimportanttodoworkthatonefindsfulfillingorworkthatpaysSelf-ExpectationandSuccessDohighly plishedpeopleachievemorethanothersmainlybecausetheyexpectmoreofthemselves?CanpeopleachievesuccessonlyiftheyaimtobeIsitbesttohavelowexpectationsandtosetgoalswearesureofCollaborationandSuccessIsitnecessaryforpeopletocombinetheireffortswiththoseofothersinordertobemosteffective?Areorganizationsorgroupsmostsuccessfulwhentheirmemberspursueindividualwishesandgoals?DopeopleachievemoresuccessbycooperationthanbyEthicsandSuccessDoesfamebringhappiness,orarepeoplewhoarenotfamousmorelikelytobehappy?Arepeople'sactionsmotivatedprimarilybyadesireforpoweroverQualityortyandSuccessDopeopleachievegreatnessonlybyfindingoutwhattheyareespeciallygoodatanddevelothatattributeaboveallAreallimportantdiscoveriestheresultoffocusingononeTechnological“Progress”Doesastrongcommitmenttotechnologicalprogresscauseasocietytoneglectothervalues,suchaseducationandtheprotectionoftheenvironment?Aretherebenefitstobegainedfromavoidingtheuseofmoderntechnology,evenwhenusingitwouldmakelifeeasier?Hastoday'sabundanceofinformationonlymadeitmoredifficultforustounderstandtheworldaroundus?Isthemostimportantpurposeoftechnologytodaydifferentfromwhatitwasinthepast?Havemodernadvancementstrulyimprovedthequalityofpeople'sDonewspapers,magazines, evision,radio,movies,theInternet,andothermediadeterminewhatisimportanttomostpeople?ShouldmodernsocietybecriticizedforbeingHeroesDowebenefitfromlearningabouttheflawsofpeopleweadmireandShouldwelimitouruseoftheterm"courage"toactsinwhichpeoplerisktheirownwell-beingforthesakeofothersortoupholdavalue?ShouldweadmireheroesbutnotIsthereavalueincelebratingcer