gmat og18逻辑新增题目解析_第1页
gmat og18逻辑新增题目解析_第2页
gmat og18逻辑新增题目解析_第3页
gmat og18逻辑新增题目解析_第4页
gmat og18逻辑新增题目解析_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩30页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

Withemployer-paidtraining,workershavethepotentialto emoreproductivenotonlyintheirpresentemploymentbutalsoinanynumberofjobswithdifferentemployers.Toincreasetheproductivityoftheirwork,manyfirmsarenningtomaintainorevenincreasetheirinvestmentsinworkertraining.Butsometrainingexpertsobjectthatifatrainedworkerishiredawaybyanotherfirm,theemployerthatpaidforthetraininghasmerelysubsidizedacompetitor.Theynotethatsuchhiringhasbeenontheriseinrecentyears.Whichofthefollowingwould,iftrue,contributemosttodefeatingthetrainingexperts'objectiontothefirms'strategy?Firmsthatpromiseopportunitiesforadvancementtotheiremployeesget,onaverage,somewhatlargernumbersofjobapplicationsfromuntrainedworkersthandofirmsthatmakenosuchpromise.Inmanyindustries,employeeswhotakecontinuing-educationcoursesaremorecompetitiveinthejobmarket.Moreandmoreeducationalandtraininginstitutionsareofferingreducedtuitionfeestofirmsthatsubsidizeworkertraining.ResearchshowsthatworkerswhosetrainingiswhollyorpartiallysubsidizedbytheiremployertendtogetatleastasmuchtrainingasdoworkerswhopayforalltheirownFormostfirmsthatinvestintrainingtheiremployees,thevalueaddedbythatinvestmentinemployeeswhostayexceedsthevaluelostthroughotheremployee'leavingtoworkforothercompanies.而且在其他提供的很多岗位上都会有更高的生产力。为了提升他们员工的生产力,很多公司打算去保持甚至是增加在员工培训方面的投资。但是有一些培训专家说,如果一个员工培训好后被其他公司挖走了,那么花钱培训这个员工反而是在为竞争补贴竞争对手了。他们提到,这种挖角式雇佣最近几年有上涨趋势。因为最近越来越多员工被挖角,所以花的前培训员工是在补贴竞争对手,从而不应选项翻译及分承诺给员工提供培训机会的公司,会有没被培训的岗位申请者,相对于其他没D研究显示,完全或者部分依赖公司提供培训的员工和那些完全靠自己培训的员工获E正确答案。对于绝大多数花钱给员工提供培训的公司而言,这项投资给那些留下的员工所增加的价值超过了那些跳槽离开的员工所带走的价值。这说明花钱培训还是有价值的,应该投资。削弱结论。Politicaltheorist:Evenwiththebestspies,areaexperts,andsalitesurveillance,foreignassessmentscanstilllackimportantinformation.Insuchcircumstancesintuitivejudgmentisvital.Anationalleaderwithsuchjudgmentcanmakegooddecisionsaboutforeignevenwhencurrentinformationis plete,since Whichofthefollowing,iftrue,mostlogicallycompletesthethecentralreasonforfailureinforeigndecisionmakingistheabsenceofcriticalthoseleaderswhoseforeigndecisionshavebeenhighlyrankedhavealsobeenfoundtohavegoodintuitivejudgment.bothintuitivejudgmentandgoodinformationarerequiredforsounddecisiongoodforeigndecisionsoftenleadtoimprovedmethodsofgatheringintuitivejudgmentcanproducegooddecisionsbasedonpastexperience,evenwhenthereareimportantgapsincurrentinformation.政治理论家:即便有最好的,行业专家以及,政策决定依然缺少重要的信息。在这种情况下,判断至关重要。一个有判断的国家可以做出好的决定,关于政策,即目前的信息不完整的情况下,因为选项翻译及分B那些政策受到高度认可的也有很好地判断。只是再重复判断好的 E正确答案。判断可以基于以往的经历做出好的决策,即目前的信息存在很大缺失的情况下。说明过往经验是能做判断的原因。Archaeologistsusetechnologytoyzeancientsites.Itislikelythatthistechnologywilladvanceconsiderablyinthenearfuture,allowingarchaeologiststogathermoreinformationthaniscurrentlypossible.Iftheystudycertainsitesnow,theyriskcontaminatingorcompromisingthemforfuturestudies.Therefore,inorderto izethepotentialforgatheringknowledgeinthelongrun,ateamofarchaeologistsnstodelaytheexaminationofanewlyexcavatedsite.Whichofthefollowingwouldbemostusefultoinvestigateforthepurposeofevaluatingthen'sprospectsforachievingitsgoal?Whetheranyofthecontentsofthesitewillsignificantlydeterioratebeforetheanticipatedtechnologyisavailable.WhethertherewillcontinuetobeimprovementsontherelevantWhethertheteamcanstudyasiteotherthanthenewlyexcavatedsiteforthetimeWhetherthesitewasinhabitedbyaveryancientWhethertheanticipatedtechnologywilldamageobjectsunder考古学家利用技术分析古代的场地。有可能这些技术在未来会有很大的进步,从而可以让考古学家能够比现在的收集信息。如果他们现在就分析这些场地的话,拿这些场考古小打算推迟新发现的场地的研究。文章逻辑选项翻译及分A正确答案。是否在期待的技术实现之前,这些场地中的东西见识很大程度上腐坏?回答的信息,不管是否存在损毁,反正比现在的信息多就可以。无关。Beginningin1966allnewcarssoldinMorodiawererequiredtohavesafetybeltsandpowersteering.PreviouslymostcarsinMorodiawerewithoutthesefeatures.Safetybeltshelptopreventinjuriesincollisions,andpowersteeringhelpstoavoidcollisionsinthefirstce.Buteventhoughin1966one-seventhofthecarsinMorodiawererecedwithnewcars,thenumberofcarcollisionsandcollision-relatedinjuriesdidnotdecline.Whichofthefollowing,iftrueaboutMorodia,mosthelpstoexinwhythenumberofcollisionsandcollision-relatedinjuriesinMorodiafailedtodeclinein1966?Becauseofadriver-educationn,mostdriversandpassengersincarsthatdidhavesafetybeltsusedthemin1966.Mostofthenewcarsboughtin1966wereboughtinthemonthsofJanuaryandIn1965,substantiallymorethanone-seventhofthecarsinMorodiawererecedwithnewcars.Anexcessiverelianceonthenewsafetyfeaturesledmanyownersofnewcarstodrivelesscautiouslyin1966thanbefore.Theseatbeltsandpowersteeringputintonewcarssoldin1966hadtoundergostrictquality-controlinspectionbymanufacturers,whetherthecarsweremanufacturedinMorodiaornot.1966年开始,MM的大部分车都19661/7M车辆换成了新的车,但是车辆碰撞以及碰撞产1/7的车换成了安装安全装置的车,本来应该减少车辆碰撞以及受伤,但却没有。选项翻译及分因为教育活动的举办,大部分的和乘客在1966年都会使用安全带。既然使 C19651/7的车陂替换成了新车。每年都有新车替换老车,正常每年都D正确选项。对这些的过度依赖,导致很多新车的车主开车不如1966年以前了。开车不,所以造成了的和受伤。E1966年销售的新车上安装的安全带和自动转向装着必须经过生产商严苛的质量把关,M当地生产。无关。ChacoCanyon,asettlementoftheancientAnasazicultureinNorthAmerica,hasmassivebuildings.ItmusthavebeenamajorAnasazicenter. ysisofwoodsamplesshowsthatsomeofthetimberforthebuildingscamefromtheChuskaandSanMateomountains,50fromChacoCanyon.Onlyamajorculturalcenterwouldhavetheorganizationalpowertoimporttimberfrom Intheargumentgiven,thetwoportionsinboldfaceywhichofthefollowingThefirstisapremiseusedtosupporttheargument'smainconclusion;thesecondistheargument'smainconclusion.Thefirstistheargument'smainconclusion;thesecondisapremiseusedtosupportthatThefirstisoneoftwopremisesusedtosupporttheargument'smainconclusion;thesecondistheotherofthosetwopremises.Thefirstisapremiseusedtosupporttheargument'smainconclusion;thesecondisapremiseusedtosupportanotherconclusiondrawnintheargument.Thefirstisinferredfromanotherstatementintheargument;thesecondisinferredfromthefirst.InMerniacommercialfossilhuntersoftensellimportantfossilstheyhavefound,nottouniversitiesormuseums,buttoindividualcollectors,whopaymuchbetterbutgenerallydonotallowresearchersaccesstotheircollections.Toincreasethenumberoffossilsavailableforresearch,somelegislatorsproposerequiringallfossilsthatarefoundinMerniatobesoldonlytouniversitiesormuseums.Whichofthefollowing,iftrue,moststronglyindicatesthatthelegislators'proposalwillfailtoachieveitsgoal?SomefossilhuntersinMerniaarenotcommercialfossilhunters,butratherareamateurswhokeepthefossilsthattheyfind.MostfossilsfoundinMerniaarecommontypesthathavelittlescientificCommercialfossilhuntersinMerniacurrentlysellsomeofthefossilstheyfindtouniversitiesandmuseums.ManyuniversitiesinMerniadonotengageinfossilMostfossilsarefoundbycommercialfossilhunters,andtheywouldgiveuplookingforfossilsiftheywerenolongerallowedtoselltoindividualcollectors.在M化石商人经常把他们发现的重要化石卖给个人收藏者,而不是大学或者博物馆,以被研究的化石的数量,一些者提出要求所有在M发现的化石只能卖给大学或者文章逻辑通过要求化石商人只能把化石卖个大学和博物馆à增加被研究的化石的数量削弱,说明无法实现这个目的。选项翻译及分AM,有些寻找化石的人并不是化石商人,而是业余的人,只是把自己找到的化石自己大部分在MDM很多大学是不参与研究的。但是只要研究机构参与研究,这个n就有用E正确答案。大部分化石都是这些化石商人找到的,如果他们不允许把化石卖给个人收集者的话他们将放弃寻找化石。所以一旦退出这个政策,这些化石商人跟本就不会去找化石,这样的话,可被研究的化石就更少了,反而适得其反。TheheavytrafficinMasanaisagrowingdrainonthecity'seconomy-thecloggingofthestreetsofthecentralbusinessdistrictalonecosttheeconomymorethan$1.2billionoverthepastyear.Inordertoaddressthisproblem,officialsntointroducecongestionpricing,bywhichdriverswouldpaytoenterthecity'smostheavilytraffickedareasduringthebusiesttimesoftheday.Whichofthefollowing,iftrue,wouldmoststronglyindicatethatthenwillbea yone-fifthofthevehiclesinthecentralbusinessdistrictareintransitfromonesideofthecitytotheother.nnersexpectthat,withoutcongestionpricing,trafficinMasanaislikelytogrowby6percentinthenextfiveyears.Inotherurbanareas,congestionpricinghasstronglyencouragedcarpooling(sharingofridesbyprivatecommuters).Severalstudieshaveshownthatareductionintrafficof15percentinMasanacouldresultin5,500ormorenewjobs.Over30percentofthevehiclesinthecity'scenterareoccupiedbymorethanoneM的繁忙交通在成了城市经济的浪费,去年单单就中心城市街道的堵塞就花掉了超过12亿。为了解决这个问题,打算收拥堵费,凡是在一天中的交通繁忙时期,付钱选项翻译及分 B计划者预期,如果没有拥堵费的话,M的交通繁忙程度有可能在未来的5C正确答案。在其他城市,交通拥堵费用很大程度上促成了拼车(通勤者共享车。DM15%550E城市中心超过30%Economist:Thepriceoftapwaterinourregionshouldberaiseddrastically.sinlocalfreshwater,reservoirshavebeendecliningforyearsbecausewaterisbeingusedfasterthanincanbereplenished.Sincethepriceoftapwaterhasbeenlow,fewusershavebotheredtoadopteveneasyconservationmeasures.Thetwosectionsinboldfaceywhichofthefollowingrolesintheeconomist'sThefirstisaconclusionforwhichsupportisprovided,andwhichinturnsupportsthemainconclusion;thesecondisthemainconclusion.Thefirstisanobservationforwhichthesecondprovidestheexnation;thesecondisthemainconclusionbutnottheonlyconclusion.Thefirstisapremisesupportingtheargument'smainconclusion;soistheThefirstistheonlyconclusion;thesecondprovidesanexnationfortheThefirstisthemainconclusion;thesecondisaconclusionforwhichsupportisprovided,andwhichinturnsupportsthefirst.WhichofthefollowingmostlogicallycompletestheAccordingtothelastpre-electionpollinWhippleton,mostvotersbelievethatthethreeproblemsernmentneedstoaddress,inorderofimportance,arepollution,crime,andunemployment.Yetintheelection,candidatesfrompartiesperceivedasstronglyagainstpollutionweredefeated,whilethoseelectedwereallfrompartieswithahistoryofopposinglegislationdesignedtoreducepollution.Theseresultsshouldnotbetakentoindicatethatthepollwasinaccurate,however,since somevotersinWhippletondonotbelievethatpollutionneedstobeeverycandidatewhowasdefeatedhadastrongantipollutiontherewerenoissuesotherthancrime,unemployment,andpollutiononwhichthecandidateshadsignificantdifferencesofopinionallthecandidateswhowereelectedwereperceivedasbeingstrongeragainstbothcrimeandunemploymentthanthecandidateswhoweredefeatedmanyofthepeoplewhovotedintheelectionrefusedtoparticipateinthe根据去年W竞选前的,大部分选民认为有三个问题需要解决,按照重要性的顺序,分别是污染,和失业问题。然而,在竞选中,污染的候选人反而落选了,而被选的候选人都来自有过设立减少污染历史的党派。然而,这些结果并不能表明之前的确,因为.解释为什么后来选民没有投选最支持解决污染问题的候选人,和之前的不一样,却选项翻译及分AWD正确答案。所有被选的候选人都以及失业,比落败的候选人。说明没有选那个污染的候选人,并不是民众不重视污染,而是,那个候选人没有顾忌民众E很多中参与投票的人都参加。无关ManufacturingntsinArundiahaverecentlybeenacquiredinsubstantialnumberbyinvestorsfromabroad.Arundianpoliticiansareproposinglegislativeactiontostopsuchinvestment,justifyingtheproposalbyarguingthatforeigninvestors,opportunisticallyexploitingarecentfallinthevalueoftheArundiancurrency,areabletobuyArundianassetsatlessthattheirtruevalue.Whichofthefollowing,iftrue,caststhemostseriousdoubtontheadequacyoftheArundianpoliticians'justificationfortheproposedlegislation?TheArundianernmentoriginally edthefallinthevalueoftheArundiancurrencybecausethefallmadeRrundianexportsmorecompetitiveoninternationalmarkets.ForeigninvestorswhoacquiredArundianmanufacturingntsgenerallydidsowithnointentionofkeeandrunningthosentsoverthelongterm.WithouttherecentfallinthevalueoftheRrundiancurrency,manyoftheArundianassetsboughtbyforeigninvestorswouldhavebeenbeyondthefinancialreachofthoseinvestors.InCongcordia,acountrybroadlysimilartoArundian,theshareofmanufacturingassetsthatisforeign-controlledis60percenthigherthanitisinRrundian.Thetruevalueofaninvestmentisdeterminedbythevalueoftheprofitesfromit,andlowvalueoftheArundiancurrencyhasdepressedthevalueofanyprofitsearnedbyforeigninvestorsfromArundianassets.A的被很多国外的投资人并购。A的政客正打算推出这种并购,认为国外投资人,投机性的利用最近A国货币贬值的机会,能够以低于其自身价值的价格到A的资产。因为担心国外投资人投机性的利用货币贬值的机会低价购入A国资产,A国打算禁选项翻译及分AA国一开始很乐见A国的货币贬值,因为货币贬值可以让A国的产品在国际市B那些并购A国的国外投资人之所以这样做并没有想要长期持有和运营这些工C如果没有最近A国的货币贬值,A国的资产外国根本买不起。更加说明这些国外投资人利用这次货币贬值的机会低价购入A国的资产。DACA60%C国无E正确答案。投资的真正价值是由投资带来的利润决定的,A的货币贬值压低了任何外国投资者通过A国资产所赚取利润的价值。意味着国外投资人这段时期资产赚取的利润因货币贬值而减少,而并没有利用货币贬值来投机。从而A国国外投资Newspapereditorshouldnotallowreporterstowritetheheadlinesfortheirownstories.Thereasonforthisisthat,whiletheheadlinesthatreportersthemselveswriteareoftenclever,whattypicallymakesthemcleveristhattheytolittle-knowninformationthatisfamiliartothereporterbutthatneverappearsexplicitlyinthestoryitself.Whichofthefollowing,iftrue,moststrengthenstheThereporterwhowritesastoryisusuallybettercedthanthereporter'seditoristojudgewhatthestory'smostnewsworthyfeaturesare.Towriteathatisclever,a musthavesufficientunderstandingofthestorythatthe Mostreportersrarelybothertofindouthowotherreportershavewrittenstoriesandheadlinesaboutthesameeventsthattheythemselveshavecovered.Forvirtuallyanystorythatareporterwrites,thereareatleastafewpeoplewhoknowmoreaboutthestory'ssubjectmatterthandoesthereporter.Thekindofheadlinesthatnewspapereditorswantarethosethatanyonewhohasreadareporter'sstoryinitsentiretywillrecognizeasclever文章翻译报纸编辑不应该允许写一些他们自己故事的标题。因为虽然自己写的标题虽然都非常好,但是让标题看上去这么好的是他们提及了极少有人知道的信息,这些信息们自己非常熟悉,但是在故事里表现的并不明确。因为写在标题里的信息在文中表现额不明显,所以建议不应该让写他们自己故选项翻译及分A写故事的比编辑更有立场判断什么事一个故事最有价值的特点。更加说明由B想要写出一个非常好的标题,必须足够了解和标题对应的故事内容。更加说明该由记C大部分极少费心去了解其他如何写他们已经涉及过的内容的文章和标题。无Proponentsoftherecentlyintroducedtaxonsalesofnewluxuryboatshadarguedthatataxthissortwouldbeanequitablewaytoincreaseernmentrevenuebecausetheadmittedlyheavytaxburdenwouldfallonlyonwealthypeopleandneithertheynoranyoneelsewouldsufferanyeconomichardship.Infact,however,20percentoftheworkersemployedbymanufacturersofluxuryboatshavelosttheirjobsasadirectresultofthistax.Theinformationgiven,iftrue,moststronglysupportswhichoftheThemarketforluxuryboatswouldhavecollapsedevenifthenewtaxonluxuryboatshadbeenlower.Thenewtaxwouldproduceanetgainintaxrevenuefortheernmentonlyiftheyearlytotalrevenuethatitgeneratesexceedsthetotalofanyyearlytax-revenuedecreaseresultingfromtheworkers'lossofjobs.Becausemanypeopleneverbuyluxuryitems,imposingasalestaxonluxuryitemsisthekindoflegislativeactionthatdoesnotcostincumbentlegislatorsmuchpopularsupport.Beforethetaxwasinstituted,luxuryboatswerelargelyboughtbypeoplewhowerenotTaxescanbeequitableonlyiftheirburdenisevenlydistributeovertheentire最近提出对新的高级船只的销售收税的政策,支持这个政策的人认为这种种类的是一种合理的增加收入的方式,因为确实较重的纳税负担只落在了的身上,并且不管是他们还是其他人都不会经济困境。然而,事实却是,这个的增加导致接近20%这些造船厂里的员工失业了。这道题属于归纳推理题,根据文章细节推测结论。文章内容告诉我们的细节:支持增加税收的人认为这个税的征收只会影响;而事实却非常,反而是很多底层的员工失业了。选项翻译及分A即便降低高档船只新,高档船只的市场亦可能会。降低之后的可能结果根据文B正确答案。新的会增加的收入,只有当新的年收入的增加超过由于失业带来的年下降。既然增加可能会带来副作用,那么只有当副作用小于正作用的C因为很多人从来不买奢侈品,所以设置奢侈品销售税这种行为并不会减少公众对在任当权者的支持。这个从文章中看不出来有多少人奢侈品。D在实施新政策之前,高档船只大部分都是被那些没那么有钱的人买走了。这个不可E只有当所有人都会承担的压力的时候,才叫做真正的公平合理。不可推测InWarelandlastyear,16percentoflicenseddriversunder21and11percentofdriversages21-24wereinseriousaccidents.Bycontrast,only3percentoflicenseddrivers65andolderwereinvolvedinseriousaccidents.Thesefiguresclearlyshowthatthegreaterexperienceanddevelopedhabitsofcautionpossessedbydriversinthe65-and-oldergroupmakethemfarsaferbehindthewheelthanyoungerdriversare.WhichofthefollowingisanassumptiononwhichtheargumentDrivers65andolderdonot,onaverage,driveverymanyfewer peryearthandrivers24andyounger.Drivers65andolderdonotconstituteasignificantlylargerpercentageoflicenseddriversinWarelandthandriversages18-24do.Drivers65andolderarelesslikelythanaredrivers24andyoungertodriveduringweatherconditionsthatgreatlyincreasetheriskofaccidents.Thedifferencebetweentheaccidentrateofdriversunder21andofthoseages21-24isattributabletothegreaterdrivingexperienceofthoseintheoldergroup.Thereisnoagebracketforwhichtheaccidentratelowerthanitisforlicenseddrivers65andolder.去年在W,16%的21岁以下的持证以及11%的21-24岁的持证遭遇了很严重的。而与此相反,65岁以上的持证中只有3%遭遇了严重的。这些数据很显然表明65及以上老的的经验和已形成的警觉性的习惯让他们比年轻有对比年轻和老中发生严重的概率不一样,得出结论说明老的经验和警觉性更高,实际上就是在给年轻和老中的数据差异找原因。假设,取非削弱,优先看否定选项,取非选项后说明,年轻和老的数据性差异和老的经验及警觉性的因果关系不存在。若否定选项没有正确的再看肯定选项,依然要取非削弱选项翻译及分A正确答案。取非后(去掉NOT)的意思:65岁以上的老平均来讲每年行驶的里程数比24以下的年轻少得多。取非后构成他因削弱,之所以年轻率高,老率低,不是因为老的经验多,而是因为老形式的里程数少。B取非后的意思:65岁以上的老比18-24岁的年轻在所有执证中占得比例C65岁以上的老比24岁以下的年轻更不可能再容易增加率的的天气不好的情况下开车。取非后的意思:65岁以上的老和24以下的年轻相比在增加车祸率de天气不好的情况下开车的可能性差不多,不能削弱。D21岁一下和21-24岁之间发生的比率的差异是由于大一些的有E取非后的意思:有个段的率比65岁以上的老年人率高。这个歌文章无关,并没有说这个段是哪个段。LastyearComfortAirlineshadtwiceasmanydelayedflightsastheyearbefore,butthenumberofcomintsfrompassengersaboutdelayedflightswentupthreetimes.ItisunlikelythatthisdisproportionateincreaseincomintswasrootedinanincreaseinoveralldissatisfactionwiththeserviceComfortAirlinesprovides,sincetheairlinemadeaspecialefforttoimproveotheraspectsofitsservicelastyear.Whichofthefollowing,iftrue,mosthelpstoexinthedisproportionateincreaseincustomercomints?ComfortAirlineshadmoreflightslastyearthantheyearLastyearasingleperiodofunusuallybadweathercausedalargenumberofflightstobeSomeoftheimprovementsthatComfortAirlinesmadeinitsservicewererequiredby ernmentregulations.TheaveragelengthofflightdelaywasgreaterlastyearthanitwastheyearTheaveragenumberofpassengersperflightwasnohigherlastyearthantheyear去年C航空公司延误的航班是以往的两倍,但是乘客对航班延误的抱怨却上涨了三倍。抱怨的异常增加不太可能是由于乘客对于C文章存在,航班延误只增至两倍,但是抱怨确增至三倍,多出来的抱怨是什么原因导选项翻译及分AC航空公司去年比前年的航班了。无关B去年一段时间气候特别差导致了大量航班的延误。无关。已经说航班延误只是原来的CC航空公司的一些服务上的改进市规章要求的。无关E去年和千年相比,每台飞机的平均乘客数量并没有。无关ThekindsofhandandwristinjuriesthatresultfromextendeduseofacomputerwhilemaintaininganincorrectposturearecommonamongschoolchildreninHarnville.Computersareimportanttotheschoolcurriculumthere,soinsteadofreducingtheamounttheirstudentsusecomputers,teachersntobringaboutasharpreductioninthenumberoftheseinjuriesbycarefullymonitoringtheirstudents'posturewhenusingcomputersintheclassroom.Whichofthefollowingwoulditbemostusefultoknowinordertoassessthelikelihoodthattheteachers'nwillbesuccessful?Whetherextendeduseofcomputerwhilemaintainingincorrectposturecancauseinjuriesotherhandandwristinjuries.WhetherhandandwristinjuriesnotcausedbycomputerusearecommonamongschoolchildreninHarnville.WhatproportionofschoolchildreninHarnvillewithhandandwristinjuriesusecomputersextensivelyoutsidetheclassroom.Whetherchangesinthecurriculumcouldreducetheschools'dependenceonWhatproportionofschoolchildreninHarnvillealreadyusecorrectposturewhileusinga由于用错误的过度使用电脑而造成的手部及碗部类受伤在H地的学生中非常普遍。电脑课程在那儿是非常重要的一门课程,所以学校没有减少学生使用电脑课量,而是打算去严格监督学生在课堂上正确使用电脑的来减少该类受伤的数量。选项翻译及分是否用不正确的使用电脑将会导致除了手腕部受伤之外的受伤?跟能否减少手部受伤没有关系。是否不是由使用电脑导致的手部受伤在H当地的学生中很普遍?文章中问的就是由于错误的电脑使用导致的手部受伤可否减少,所以跟不是由电脑导致的手部受伤没有关系。无关正确答案。H当地的有手部受伤的学生中有多大比例在课外过多使用电脑?回答是比在H有多大比例的学生已经使用正确的使用电脑了?文章已经说了是由于使用CountryX'srecentstock-tradingscandalshouldnotdiminishinvestors'confidenceinthecountry'sstockmarket.Foronething,thediscoveryofthescandalconfirmsthatCountryXhasastrongregulatorysystem,asthefollowingconsiderationsshow.Inanystockmarket,somefraudulentactivityisinevitable.Ifastockmarketiswellregulated,anysignificantstock-tradingfraudinitwillverylikelybediscovered.Thisdeterspotentialperpetratorsandfacilitatesimprovementinregulatoryprocesses.Intheargument,theportioninboldfaceyswhichofthefollowingItistheargument'sonlyItisaconclusionforwhichtheargumentprovidessupportandwhichitselfisusedtosupporttheargument'smainconclusion.Itisargument'smainconclusionandissupportedbyanotherexplicitlystatedconclusionforwhichfurthersupportisprovided.Itisassumptionforwhichnoexplicitsupportisprovidedandusedtosupporttheargument'sonlyconclusion.Itiscompoundstatementcontainingboththeargument'smainconclusionandanassumptionusedtosupportthatconclusion.Veterinariansgenerallyderivesomeoftheir efromsellingseveralmanufacturers'linesofpet-careproducts.Knowingthatpetownersrarelythrowawaymailfromtheirpet'sveterinarianunread,onemanufacturerofpet-careproductsofferedpromotionalmaterialsonitsproductstoveterinariansformailingtotheir s.Veryfewveterinariansacceptedtheoffer,however,eventhoughthemanufacturer'sproductsareofhighquality.Whichofthefollowing,iftrue,mosthelpsotherexintheveterinarians'reactiontothemanufacturer'spromotionalscheme?Mostoftheveterinarianstowhomthe promotionalmaterialswereofferedwerealreadysellingthemanufacturer'sper-careproductstotheir Thespecialpromotionalmaterialswereintendedasasupplementtothemanufacturer'susualpromotionalactivitiesratherthanasarecementforthem.Themanufacturer'sproducts,unlikemostequallygoodcompetingproductssoldbyveterinarians,arealsoavailableinpetstoresandinsupermarkets.Manypetownershavebegundemandingqualityinproductstheybuyfortheirpetsthatisashighasthatinproductstheybuyforthemselves.Veterinarianssometimes mendthatpetownersuseproductsformulatedforpeoplewhennosuitableproductspeciallyformulatedforanimalsisavailable.兽医们的收入通常有一部分是来自售卖一些生产商的宠物相关产品。了解到宠物的主人很少会扔掉其宠物的兽医的未读信件,一个宠物产品的生产商给兽医提供他们生产的产品的免费促销品,让这些兽医寄给自己的客户。然而,却极少有兽医会这样做,尽管生产上的产品治疗很高。选项翻译及分A被生产商派送宣传品的大部分的兽医已经在销售这些生产商的宠物产品给他们自己B这次的特殊宣传品只是对以往宣传的一种补充,而不是替代原来的宣传活动。无关。C正确答案。这个生产商的产品也会在宠物商店和超市买到,这一点和其他被兽医所销售的质量等同的竞争对手的产品是不同的。说明如果兽医帮这些生产商推销了产品,并不能确保可会一定会来兽医这里产品,因为也可以从超市买到。D很多宠物的主人对于宠物产品的要求开始和对他们自己所用产品的质量一样高了。无关,文章说了,这些生产商的产品质量挺好的。E兽医有的时候会建议宠物的主人可以把给人设计的产品也给宠物使用,如果没有合适专门设计给宠物的产品的话。无关。NorthAirchargeslowfaresforitseconomy-classseats,butitprovidesverycrampedseatingandfewamenities.Marketresearchshowsthateconomypassengerswouldwillinglypaymoreforwiderseatingandbetterservice,andadditionalrevenueprovidedbythesehigherticketpriceswouldmorethancovertheadditionalcostofprovidingtheseamenities.EventhoughNorthAirissearchingforwaystoimproveitsprofitability,ithasdecidednottomakethes

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论