学术研究方法3-文献综述

Literature文献综述的作精品文文献综述的常用方文献综述结构和工作路从文献综述文献综文献综述（Literature背景描述（Background文献综述的作LiteratureLiteratureRaymondR.LiuUniversityofMassachusettsBostonTheselectionofavailables(bothpublishedandunpublished)onthetopic,whichcontaininformation,ideas,dataandevidencewrittenfromaparticularstandpointtofulfillcertainaimsorexpresscertainviewsonthenatureofthetopicandhowitistobeinvestigated,andtheeffectiveevaluationofthesesinrelationtotheresearchbeingproposed.TheTheRoleofLiterature TodemonstrateskillsinliteratureToshowcommandofthesubjectareaandunderstandingoftheproblemTojustifytheresearchtopic,design,andPurposesofLiteratureDistinguishwhathasbeendonefromwhatneedstobeDiscoverimportantvariablesrelevanttotheIdentifyrelationshipsbetweenideasandSynthesizeandgainaEstablishthecontextofthetopicorRationalizethesignificanceoftheEnhanceandacquirethesubjectUnderstandthestructureoftheIdentifythemain ethodsandtechniquesPlacetheresearchinahistoricalcontextandshowwithstate-of-the-artQuestionstoAskDuringLiterature-WhatarethefundamentalgroundsfortheWhatarethekeytheories,conceptsandWhatarethemainquestions/problemsaddressedsoWhatarethemajorissuesanddebatesabouttheWhataretheauthor(s)’WhataretheoriginsanddefinitionsoftheWhatarethekeyHowistheresearchHowisthe owledgeHowhastheresearchcontributedtotheAGoodLiteratureReviewShouldHave-explanationoftheimportanceoftheyticalcoveringallmajorknownliteratureonthehighlevelofconceptuallinkswithinandacrosssummativeandformativeevaluationofpreviousdepthandbreadthofdiscussiononrelatedcriticalevaluationofthetheories/modelsindicationofthestrengths/weaknessesofthemethodclearandcohesiveaccuratecitationsand–小综述是学术的第一部分大综小综功详述学科发展史,专题论发现Gap，比较，导出研阐述方完整逻辑框细微的比较分文章形完整学术一部价值体资料翔实，高度归发现有价值的研究缺文40－6015－4050－100文献排常按字母顺常按顺精品文搜寻路 手册专业学 学 数据–杂–杂 运营管理领域 供应链管理领域 –回顾综述、现状综述和专题文献综述的思路（7种方法– 因果关系法（CauseandEffect可能结果法（PossibleSolution–从概念和定义出发，给出解决方案和结果，分析不合归纳法(SummativeEvaluation)DescribethenatureofthegiveexamplestoshowtheextentoftheproblemofferevidencethattheproblemexistsdevelopadefinitionoftheShowtherelevanceoftheproblemtotheprovidespecificevidence/argumentofnegativeExplaintheconsequencesifnothingisdone:provideevidenceandsummarizetheproblemCauseCauseandEffectPattern yticalEvaluation)Establishtheexistenceoftheproblem（ProblemproposepossiblecauseoftheshowthemainfactorsunderpinningtheproposedClarifyanyconfusingeliminateanyimprobable/irrelevantcauses/definitionsprovideevidenceforcauses/definitionseliminatedFocusattentiononproposedcause/definition:provideevidenceforproposedcauses/definitionssummarizetheargumentSuggestcourse mendations)ofactiontodealwithPossiblePossibleSolutionPattern(FormativeEvaluation)ConsiderdefinitionsandsolutionsalreadygiverelevantexamplesofsolutionstriedshowwhytheyfailedorwereinadequateshowfactorscausingfailureandevidenceofConsiderpossibledistinguishbetweenprovidesummaryofpossibleeffectsofalternativesmakeachoicefromalternativesbyeliminationprovideevidenceforeliminationandchoiceSummarizetheproblem,solutionstried,andwhytheyfailed mendationsforalternativeTransactionCostysis:Past,Present,AndFutureApplicationsAricRindfleisch;JanBTCA:originsandAssumptionsanddimensionsofThelogicofTCA:empiricalInwhatcontextshasTCAbeenWhatmethodshavebeenusedtoinvestigateHowvalidisTCAconceptualTheoreticalquestionsandfurtherTheconceptof TheeffectsofenvironmentalTCA’sunitofernance–理论基础 其；张弛，管理世界，2008.3•（大综述幅短的可不要引正–内容的总结，应简明扼要，概括性强。主要简述本 参考文参考文献的格–按次序排注释和引–知识就是力量[1 （1561-?）认为，知识就是力量。研究观点归纳研究成果归纳要素关专题专题专题逻辑关学科分支发展的逻辑研究对象与研究内容的关联 视例3，组织文献综组 资料来源 科学学报Vol.9No.1ResearchMemoryCardsResearchDiaryNewIdeaCardsMindMapsResearchMemoryCardsResearchDiaryNewIdeaCardsMindMaps&ResourceResource-Proposal-Action Feedbackand

Research ActionActionTheWritingIdentifytheneedsoftheWritingdowntheaimsforthereview.themain

your

DraftoutanUsesectioningtoarrangematerialrelevanttotheWritingafinalBuildingWritingafinalBuildingupafirst–影响因子和文章被次六、从文献综述 FromFromLiteratureReviewtoResearchTheResearchImaginationishaveabroadviewofabeopentoideasregardlessofhow/wherequestionandscrutinizeideas,methodsandregardlessofwhoproposedplaywithdifferentideastoseeiflinkscanbefollowideastoseewheretheymightHowtoAskQuestionswithHowtoAskQuestionswithaResearchImaginationWhatisthestructureoftheknowledgeonthisWhatandwhoarethekeyworksandWhatmethodologicalandotherassumptionsareHowhastheoriginalstudybeendevelopedandWhataretheantecedentsandconsequencesoftheconstructsstudied?WhatvariablesaremissingorsingledoutandHowaredifferentstudiesrelatedWhatcanwegainifweusedifferentAssociatiosgftiosNewinstyle,substanceorHowHowtoBeOriginalandngempiricallybasedworkthathasnotbeendoneUsingalreadyknownideas/practices/approachesbutwithanewinterpretationBringingnewevidencetobearonanoldissueorCreatinganewsynthesisthathasnotbeendoneApplyingsomethingdoneinanothercountrytoone’sApplyingatechniqueusuallyassociatedwithoneareaBeingcross-disciplinarybyusingdifferentLookingatareasthatpeopleinthedisciplinehavenotlookedatbeforeAddingtoknowledgeinawaythathasnotpreviouslybeendonebeforeRequirementsRequirementsforaPh.D.SpecializationinMakinganewcontributiontoanareaofDemonstratingahighlevelofDemonstratingWritingacoherentvolumeofinlectuallyworkofasignificantDevelothecapacityandalcharacterinlectuallymanage