企业价值评估文献综述英文版

1、Literature Review for the Theory of Business Value measurementABSTRACTBusiness value measurement depends on expectations for the future earnings, there are many ways to assess earnings, and the mainly methods are DCF method, Residual Income valuation theory, Economic Value Added valuation method and

2、 Real Options Valuation method. This article bases on the development of domestic and foreign business value theory, and gives a brief summary of the latest research, then compares the different valuation theory at home and abroad.Finally, combining with practical features of Chinese enterprise valu

3、e assessment concluded that assessments of the latest theories in Chinese enterprises.KEY WORDS : Business Value, Measurement Theory, Literature Review1、 IntroductionBusiness value measurement theory rose in the United States in the early 1960th of the 20th century. With the 50 years development and

4、 application , Western developed countries have been greatly applied in practice. At present, the theory and method of enterprise value evaluation in Western developed countries have been more and more mature，and it has been used to assess in practice. In China, the application of business value mea

5、surement theory is later than western countries which is now relatively slowly. Therefore, arranging the present research results and analysis the theory structure have been an important aspects so as to form a tight,coherent theory system. On the guidance of the business valuation practice it can e

6、stablish new methods of business valuation in China, and it is essential to promote the development of theoretical study.2、 Studies AbroadBusiness value measurement have a history of hundreds of years as an industry in Western countries. During those hundreds of years, many scholars in Western count

7、ries on business valuation have done a large number of theoretical studies.Shiller (1981) used the discounted cash flow model to describe stock prices fluctuating boundaries, and the research shows that real stock prices change significantly beyond this range. Because these uncertain information is

8、estimated with hypothesis and data processing technology. Its disadvantage is that it required too many intuition for decision makers, but also achieving many possible distribution hypothesis 1In 1995, Ohlson use the conception of clean surplus in residual income valuation model based on the use of

9、clean-surplus (clean surplus) constructing and perfecting the concept of residual income valuation model 2. Felthan and Ohlson (1995) further developed this theory, that extraordinary income sources are twofold: first, monopoly rents, second, accounting for sound doctrine. Their most prominent contr

10、ibution is presented for the evaluation of linear information models (1inear information model) 3. Evaluation of applying the residual income model, relates to the extraordinary income is not included in the current period in the time series estimates of future earnings, more difficult.1995年，Ohlson在

11、剩余收益定价模型的基础上利用干净盈余(clean surplus)的概念构建并完善了剩余收益估值模型2。Felthan和Ohlson(1995)进一步发展了这一理论，认为非常收益的来源有两个方面：其一，垄断租金；其二，会计的稳健主义。他们最突出的贡献在于提出了用以价值评估的线性信息模型(1inear information model)3。运用剩余收益模型进行价值评估，涉及到对没有包含在当期非常收益中的未来非常收益的时间序列估计，难度较大。Jackson(1997)认为，计算EVA能够使现金流量折现模型计算，更能反映企业真实经营状况并且容易评价企业历年的经营业绩4。JohnACompbell(

12、2002)应用实物期权分析方法讨论了IS(information System)的投资时机决策问题5。2000年,Copeland等几位专家合著价值评估:公司价值的衡量与管理(第三版)中,把价值评估方法分为现金流量法与非现金流量法两大类别。由于Copeland推崇现金,因而他将现金作为价值评估方法的分类标准。他主要论述了现金流量法,对于非现金流量法仅点到为止6。2003年,David Fryman和Jakob Tolleryd在合著的公司价值评估专著中,将价值评估方法分为四大类:基于现金流量的估值股利折现模型、折现现金流量模型与投资的现金流收益;基于收益的估值经济增加值(EVA);基于资产的估

13、值净资产估值;期权估值实物期权法73、 Domestic Research我国企业价值评估理论及技术的运用比较晚，而且发展较为缓慢。在我国的价值评估研究体系中，主要以DCF及其衍生模型为主。早期提出的现金流与股利贴现模型随着我国市场经济的发展，已很难适应现代快速发展中的企业的价值评估。为解决未来不确定性因素对现代企业的影响，我国学术界引进了以期权理念为基础的价值评估理论。更加完善了我国企业价值评估的理论体系。李姚矿、童昱(2006)回顾了期权定价理论在企业不确定性资产评估中的研究成果，根据科技型中小企业的特点对期权定价模型进行了修正，并以合肥市高新区内的一家科技型中小企业为案例，说明了具体的评

14、估计算过程8。肖留华 (2007)提出的企业价值评估体系是：P=NV+AV+sV，其中NV即净资产价值是目标企业的实际账面价值，在总额上等于所有者权益；V即资产溢价是指由无形资产带来的企业潜在的价值，V=NV*d，d是溢价系数，由企业成长性、管理能力、创新能力三个方面来衡量；SV是协同溢价9。白登顺与贺强(2009)对比了EVA估价法与自由现金流量折现法，发现EVA估价法优于自由现金流量折现法。与FCFF估价法相比EVA估价法具有双重优势：一方面EVA与企业价值相关联，便于了解企业每年的经营情况，对价值实效计算考核；另一方面EVA克服了自由现金流量波动较大的缺点，不受前后年度资本随意投资额的影

15、响10。黄朔，赵银川(2010)指出由剩余收益模型计算出的企业价值并不能完全代表股票的实际价格。其原因主要表现在以下四个方面：首先，股票的实际价格往往与其内在的价值不一致，股票的内在价值由上市公司的财务数据分析而来，具有一定的稳定性；而影响股票实际价格的市场因素有很多，二者很难完全一致。其次，“清洁盈余关系”是EBO模型的个重要前提假设。再次，股票非流通会影响剩余收益模型的价值评估能力。最后，从剩余收益模型的公式可以看出，企业的净资产的增长率低于净资产收益率是个必须的条件11。蒋大富，梅雨(2011)从高新技术企业的性质以及对高新技术企业价值再认识的基础上12。结合现行企业价值评估方法的优点与

16、缺点。提出高新技术企业价值评估应将收益法和期权定价法结合起来，以全面、真实地反映高新技术企业的特征及其价值。提出,创新的高新技术企业价值评估方法应是实物期权定价法与收益法的有机融合，这种融合有助于实现两种评估方法的互补，即采用收益法对高新技术企业现有的经营业务所产生的预期现金流进行折现。评估现有基础上获利能力的价值；用实物期权定价方法对高新技术企业的机会价值进行测算，两者相加得出高新技术企业的评估价值。王静,齐彩云，张东(2011)借助金融期权理论中的二叉树定价模型，将优化改进的二叉树模型运用到创业板企业价值评估当中，得出以下三方面的结论：第一，二叉树模型评估方法能够清楚、直观地反映出未来各种

17、不确定性的结果，管理者可以将其作为一种在企业未来发展中价值判断的可参考的方法。第二，同传统实物期权中的二叉树模型相比，避免了上下波动率为负的情况，推导出的参数结果符合参数的真实关系，同时保证了计算精度。第三，通过案例分析得出，改进的二叉树模型比现金流贴现的方法更能全面地考虑企业管理弹性和不确定性对企业价值的影响，得出的价值结果更能贴近真实价值13。4、 SummaryThrough the analysis of business value measurement at home and abroad, we can find that the current research is mai

18、nly the combination of new and old value measurement methods according to the real situation. above on both at home and abroad enterprise value assessment theory of analysis, can found, currently of research main is through new old value assessment method according to reality for combination, put en

19、terprise value for classification, on different type of enterprise value respectively for value assessment, again put results added, formed comparison reasonable of strategy merger enterprise value assessment results, then put value assessment system using Yu actual case in the, validation its effec

20、tiveness.通过上述对国内外企业价值评估理论的分析，可以发现，目前的研究主要是通过新老价值评估方法根据实际情况进行组合，把企业价值进行分类，对不同类型的企业价值分别进行价值评估，再把结果相加，形成比较合理的战略并购企业价值评估结果，然后把价值评估体系运用于实际案例中，验证其有效性。参考文献1 Shiller,R.J.,1981，Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent change in dividends?JAmerican Economic Review 71，PP.4214362 Ohlosn,J.A.Earnings，1995，Book Values，and Dividends in Equity Valuation, ComemporaryJ，Accounting Research 11,PP.6616873 Feltham，G.A.,Ohlson,J.A.,1995，Valuation and Clean Surplus Accountingfor Operating and Financial ActivitiesJ,Comemporary Accounting Research 11，PP6897324 J