磁化水处理与化学水处理的比较

1、磁化水处理与化学水处理的比较 Magnetic Water Treatment vs. Chemical Water Treatment （MWT vs. CWT） 磁化水处理与化学水处理的比较 In February1990, Mr.T.Ranald Templeton, P.E., the Department Head of Facilities and Operations for the pharmaceutical giant, Burroughs Wellcome Company, in 1990年2月，位于北卡罗莱纳州研发三角公园内的医药业巨子Burroughs Wellcom

2、e 公司负责营运与设备的部门主任，T. Ronald Templeton先生，在热交换器、冷却水塔系统上装置了MagneGen 磁化水处理系统。 Mr. Templeton hired Nalco Chemical Co., to run a corrosion coupon test, in the system. Nalco reps, from Nalco Chemical Co.’s Anticipating this, Mr. Templeton had already ordered Nalco to run parallel corrosion coupon

3、tests, for two more months, in two similar Burroughs Wellcome chiller-condenser-cooling tower systems, with the same water source one treated with chemicals, by IMCOR Chemical CO., and the other with MagneGen. Mr. Templeton informed Mr. Downey, that he would let the Chemical vs. No chemical tests de

4、termine which was the better system. Templeton先生同时延请Nalco化学公司于系统中实施腐蚀取样测试。 Copper and Mild Steel coupon tests were run, for two months, by Nalco, beginning, March 16, 1990. All coupon handling and system monitoring was conducted by the Nalco reps and Burroughs Wellcome engineers. No MagneGen personn

5、el were involved, in any way. Burroughs Wellcome is a highly secured pharmaceutical research laboratory, with no unauthorized entry. The results of the parallel corrosion tests, comparing traditional chemical water treatment, with no chemical magnetic water treatment, were reported by Nalco Chemical

6、 Company Analytical Laboratory, Laurel, MD, as follows: Condenser & Tower #1 (Protected by MagneGen) Condenser & Tower #2 (Protected by IMCOR) Date Coupon Material Corrosion Rate Date Coupon Material Corrosion Rate Mild Steel <0.1mpy Mild Steel 0mpy Mild Steel 1.8mpy Copper 0.2mpy Admiralty B