案例分析解决GMAT逻辑评价题没问题

1、 智 课 网 G M A T 备 考 资料 案例分析 解决GMAT逻辑评价题没问题评价题作为GMAT逻辑推理的题型之一,其考察的方向同假设题类似,主要针对段落推理中的隐含假设(条件,通常GMAT逻辑评价题的考题思维分为两种:Yes和No, 如果答案为Yes,那么我们就可以说,这个Yes回答是对段落推理过程的一种支持。如果答案为No,则情况恰恰相反。很多情形下,GMAT逻辑评价题只是要求考生针对推理成立的隐含条件(假设来判定一个最优选项,因此做GMAT逻辑评价题的关键要看考生能否在段落推理中找到这个逻辑(隐含假设。下面就让我们来看一个实例进行GMAT逻辑评价题的分析:The United Sta

2、tes is not usually thought of as a nation of parakeet lovers. Yet in a census of parakeet owners in selected comparable countries, the United States ranked second, with eleven parakeet owners per hundred people. The conclusion can be drawn from this that people in the United States are more likely t

3、o own parakeets than are people in most other countries.Knowledge of which of the following would be most useful in judging the accuracy of the conclusion?(A The number of parakeets in the United States.(B The number of parakeet owners in the United States(C The number of parakeet owners per hundred

4、 people in the country that ranked first in the census(D The number of parakeet owners in the United States compared to the numbers of owners of other pet birds in the United States(E The number of parakeet owners per hundred people in the countries not included in the census.明确题意以后,我们首先需要明确那里是本题的结论

5、与前提,本题结论的前提为“美国每一百人中拥有长尾鹦鹉的人数在进行比较的国家中处于第二位,结论为:相比较而言,美国人更加喜欢饲养长尾鹦鹉。在从前提向结论的推理过程中,考生往往会忽略一点,即GMAT逻辑评 价题结论中的most other countries除包括“selected comparable co untries”还应包括那些没有进行比较的国家,因此我们在判断结论是否正确以前,还必须知道道那些没有参与过此调查的国家的状况是怎样的。所以E为正确选项。总结,我们可以发现很多考生往往由于没有准确理解GMAT逻辑评价题的题意,导致了推理方向出现偏差,在推理推断的过程中,不仅要求考生读懂GMAT逻辑评价题的文章,更重要的是从横向与纵向对逻辑题所隐含的问题上进行分析性思维。如何达到这一点,也只有通过不断练习,善于发现GMAT逻