江浩—安徽—肺癌脑转移的治疗_第1页
江浩—安徽—肺癌脑转移的治疗_第2页
江浩—安徽—肺癌脑转移的治疗_第3页
江浩—安徽—肺癌脑转移的治疗_第4页
江浩—安徽—肺癌脑转移的治疗_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩18页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

1、肺癌脑转移的治疗进展 一石激起千重浪?Mulvenna P,et al. Lancet. 2016 Oct 22;388(10055):2004-2014. WBRT for NSCLC:Yes & No?Mulvenna P,et al. Lancet. 2016 Oct 22;388(10055):2004-2014. 本研究的一般描述 a non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised trial done at 69 UK and three Australian centres. NSCLC patients with brain metastases

2、 unsuitable for surgical resection or stereotactic radiotherapy optimal supportive care (OSC) including dexamethasone plus WBRT (20 Gy in five daily fractions) or OSC alone including dexamethasone The primary outcome measure:quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). QALYs were generated from overall surv

3、ival and patients weekly completion of the EQ-5D questionnaire. Between March 2, 2007, and Aug 29, 2014, 538 patients were recruited from 69 UK and three Australian centres, and were randomly assigned to receive either OSC plus WBRT (269) or OSC alone (269).Interpretation Although the primary outcom

4、e measure result includes the prespecified non-inferiority margin, the combination of the small difference in QALYs and the absence of a difference in survival and quality of life between the two groups suggests that WBRT provides little additional clinically significant benefit for this patient gro

5、up.Overall SurvivalAverage Quality of LifeAverage QALYForest Plot of SurvivalIn summary QUARTZ provides compelling information for clinicians and patients alike; for younger patients, WBRT might offer a survival advantage but for all other groups, omitting WBRT does not significantly affect QALY or

6、overall survival.Nov. 2016:WBRT for NSCLC the end of an era?Anna M.E.B, et al. J Thorac. Dis. 2016;8(11):E1525-E1527RTOG-RPA: Class 1-3 A three-class recursive partitioning (RPA) system by the RTOG to describe different prognostic groups of patients with brain metastases. RPA Class I: the most favor

7、able prognostic group, KPS70, an age 65 years and controlled primary tumor without extracranial metastases. RPA Class III :the poorest prognosis patients, KPS 70. RPA Class II:The remainders of patientsGaspar LE, et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.2000;47:1001-6.How to choose? Quartz trial is groun

8、dbreaking in that it is the first prospective randomized study providing evidence that poor prognosis patients with brain metastases from NSCLC do not benefit from WBRT, and BSC should be regarded standard of care in these patients. As explained, this does not hold true for younger patients, with li

9、mited or absent extracranial disease, in whom in addition to the possibility of WBRT other treatment approaches including radiosurgery alone or systemic treatment may be indicated as an alternative to WBRT.RTOG-GPA: Graded PrognosticAssessmentsSperduto PW, et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 7

10、7: 65561.RTOG-GPA: Graded PrognosticAssessmentsSperduto PW, et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 77: 65561.JCO:Jan. 2017SRS/WBRT/EGFR-TKIGPA:2-3.5&0-1.5?结论与争议 结论:对于不适合行手术/SRS放疗的非小细胞肺癌患者可以选择一激素为主的临床支持治疗,WBRT未必是必选项! 争议:试验结果的重复性研究? 扩大样本量,筛选获益亚群? 改变放疗剂量方法?54Gy? 淘尽黄沙始现金?期待更多的临床试验告诉我们最靠近真实的答案!本研究

11、的一般描述 a non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised trial done at 69 UK and three Australian centres. NSCLC patients with brain metastases unsuitable for surgical resection or stereotactic radiotherapy optimal supportive care (OSC) including dexamethasone plus WBRT (20 Gy in five daily fractions) or OSC alo

12、ne including dexamethasone The primary outcome measure:quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). QALYs were generated from overall survival and patients weekly completion of the EQ-5D questionnaire. Between March 2, 2007, and Aug 29, 2014, 538 patients were recruited from 69 UK and three Australian centres, and were randomly as

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论