海曼财政学课后答案ch02_第1页
海曼财政学课后答案ch02_第2页
海曼财政学课后答案ch02_第3页
海曼财政学课后答案ch02_第4页
海曼财政学课后答案ch02_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩21页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

1、CHAPTER 2Efficie ncy, Markets,and Gover nmentI NSTRUCTIONALBJECTIVESThe main objective of this chapter is to develop thecon cept of efficie ncy and show stude nts how it is used to evaluate econo mic performa nee. To beg in the discussi on, it is n ecessary to draw the disti ncti on betwee n positiv

2、e and no rmative econo mics. Both of these approaches are used in the chapter. An additional instructional objective is therefore to dem on strate the usefu In ess of each type of an alysis.The con cept of efficie ncy is carefully linked toresource allocati on and econo mic tran sacti ons. The chapt

3、er also introduces the student to marginal analysis of resource allocation. The distinction between total social cost and benefit, and marginal social cost and benefit is drawn for students. Graphic analysis is then used to derive the marginal conditions for efficiency. The objective is to show stud

4、ents that maximization of net social benefit requires that all activities be undertaken in each time period up to the point at which MSB = MSC.The analysis is then used to evaluate resource allocation in competitive markets operating under conditions of perfect competition with no externalities. Thi

5、s is followed by examples showing how monopoly power and government intervention can result in losses in efficiency in markets. The objective here is to show how welfare triangles can be used to measure losses in wellbeing when efficiency is not achieved.The equity-efficiency tradeoff is also introd

6、uced in the chapter. The utility possibility curve is used to show students how citizens often rationally oppose movements to efficient resource use when compensation for losses in well-being is not actually paid. Positive analysis of the equity-efficiency tradeoff is also provided, thereby closing

7、the chapter with an illustration of how the positive approach is useful to normative analysis.CHANGES INTHIS EDITIONThis chapter has been updated where needed. Otherwise, there have been no changes in this core theory chapter. A new problem was added to the end of the chapter.CHAPTEROUTLINEPositive

8、and Normative EconomicsNormative Evaluation of Resource Use: The EfficiencyCriterionMarginal Conditions for EfficiencyMarkets, Prices, and Efficiency ConditionsWhen Does Market Interaction Fail to Achieve EfficiencyMonopolistic PowerHow Taxes Can Cause Losses in Efficiency in Competitive MarketsPubl

9、ic Policy Perspective: The Tax System and the BirthRateAn Example of Positive Economic AnalysisHow Government Subsidies Can Cause Losses in EfficiencyMarket Failure: A Preview of the Basis for GovernmentActivityEquity versus EfficiencyThe Tradeoff between Efficiency and Equity: A Graphic AnalysisThe

10、 Tradeoff between Equity and Efficiency in a System of Competitive MarketsPositive Analysis Tradeoff Between Equity and EfficiencyInternational View: Agricultural Subsidies, InternationalTrade Restrictions, and Global EfficiencyMAJORPOINTS ANDLECTURESUGGESTIONS1. Instructors may wish to emphasize th

11、e difference between the normative and positive approaches. The normative approach is based on underlying values that embody an individualistic ethic. The positive approach is simply a scientific method used to formulate hypotheses subject to empirical verification. I point out to my students that t

12、he normative approach in public finance sets up benchmarks against which the impact of government regulations, expenditures, and taxes can be evaluated.2. There are two aspects of efficiency that are useful to emphasize in lectures:a. Efficiency, as the term is commonly used by the layperson, simply

13、 means avoidance of waste in achieving any useful objective. Students are most likely already familiar with this aspect of efficiency.b. The second aspect of efficiency deals with exchange. Even when production is accomplished without waste, additional net gains are usually possible through mutually

14、 agreeable exchanges.In discussing the second aspect of efficiency, with which students are less familiar, you can point out that freedom to trade is an important aspect of efficiency. Constraints on mutually agreeable trade thereby prevent attainment of efficiency when no third parties are affected

15、 by those transactions.3. The derivation of the marginal conditions for efficiency provides a good opportunity to review marginal analysis for students. Make sure to confine your discussion to a particular good. The example in the text uses bread. I find that students are quite receptive to the noti

16、on that net social gains are maximized when each possible good or service is made available up to the point at which MSB = MSC. The inclusion of the total social benefit and total social cost curves in Figure 2.1 in the text helps students see how additional production of goods is inefficient beyond

17、 the point at which MSB = MSC, even though TSB TSC for additional output.4. Notice how the marginal net benefit is defined as the difference between the marginal social benefit and the marginal social cost of any given quantity of a good.5. After deriving the efficiency conditions, I like to reinfor

18、ce the theory by immediately showing students how the marginal conditions are satisfied under ideal conditions in perfectly competitive markets. In doing so, I introduce the concepts of marginal private benefit and marginal private cost. I show how P = MPB = MPC in competitive markets. Finally, I se

19、t the stage for future analysis in Chapter 3 by pointing out that, provided no third parties (other than buyers and sellers) are affected by market exchanges, P = MSB = MSC. Because these conditions are used throughout the text, it is important for students to understand the derivation. I find that

20、students have little difficulty with the exposition. If you get the significance of these points across early in the course, it is easy to show how taxes and subsidies prevent prices from simultaneously reflecting marginal social costs and benefits.The numerical example in the text has been helpful

21、to my students. Note that I use the same numbers when discussing competitive markets for bread.6. The obvious next step is to provide your students with examples of cases for which marketsdo not achieveefficiency. The exercise of monopoly power is a good example of how lack of competition in markets

22、 can cause losses in efficiency. This example can then be supplemented with analysis of the effects of taxes and subsidies on private choices in markets. The example of target prices for agriculture in the United States shows how subsidies to agriculture result in more than the efficient amount of r

23、esources allocated to agricultural uses.You might wish to supplement these examples with some of your own. In any case, the main instructional objective is to show students how losses in well-being resulting from inefficient output levels can be measured as triangular areas in the graphs.The Public

24、Policy Perspectiveshows students how thepersonal exemption in the U.S. income tax can be viewed as a subsidy to raising children.7. I believe that it is important to emphasize the equityefficiency tradeoff early in the course. This provides an opportunity to show how the positive approach can be use

25、d to predict the net gains and losses to citizens.The utility possibility curve is a good tool to illustrate political conflict. First make sure that students see the similarity between the utility possibility curve and the production possibility curve. In particular, point out that the maximum poss

26、ible level of well-being of any one person, given the well-being of others, depends on resources available and technology.The curve also shows how there is no one unique efficient allocation of resources. It can be used to show how the efficient outcomes of competitive interaction can result in a di

27、stribution of well-being for which many persons live in poverty.8. I like to use the utility possibility curve to show how changes in resource allocation can result in both gainers and losers even when there is movement from inefficient to efficient resource use. Unless compensation is actually paid

28、, the losers act to prevent the resource change that makes them worse off.A NOTE ON THEAPPENDIX TOCHAPTER2The appendix to Chapter 2 sets up a two-dimensional model of efficient resource. This appendix can easily be skipped because the basic notions are developed intuitively within the chapter. If, h

29、owever, youhave good students, you canassign the appendix and derive the conditions in class.The standard welfare model is developed in the appendix and Edgeworth-Bowley boxes are used to derive the efficiency conditions.OUTLINE OF THEAPPENDIX TOCHAPTER2A Model of Efficient Resource UseProduction an

30、d TechnologyProductive EfficiencyThe Production Possibility CurveTastes and UtilityAttainment of EfficiencyAn Interpretation of Efficiency ConditionsRanking Efficient Outcomes: Social Welfare FunctionsEfficiency and Economic InstitutionsPure Market Economy and Productive EfficiencyA Pure Market Econ

31、omy and Pareto EfficiencyIncome DistributionAlternative Economic Institutions and EfficiencyMarket Imperfections(T)(T)TRUE/F ALSE QUESTIONS1. The normative approach to public finance prescribes certain actions to achieve predetermined criteria.2. Positive economic analysis is based on underlying val

32、ue judgments. (F)3.“The government should abolish tariffs to achieve efficien cy” is a normative statement.(T)4. It is possible for efficiencynot to be attained even ifall production is carried on without waste. (T)5. Efficiency is attained when resources are used each yearin such a way that no furt

33、her net gain is possible.6. The efficient annual output of any given good is attained if that good is made available in amounts up to the point at which the total social benefit of the good equals the total social cost. (F)7. If the marginal social benefit of smoke detectors exceeds its marginal soc

34、ial cost, then additional net gains are possible from an increased annual smoke detector production. (T)8. Monopoly power causes losses in efficiency because the marginal social benefit of output exceeds its marginal social cost at the monopoly output. (T)9. Government regulations that require airli

35、nes to serve routes for which the maximum price that passengers are willing to pay for a trip fall short of the minimum price that sellers are willing to accept are likely to cause losses in efficiency.(T)10. Points lying below a utility possibility curve are efficient. (F)11. Government programs ca

36、n achieve efficiency when the gains to gainers from those policies exceed the losses to those who bear the costs. (T)12. If the marginal social cost of beer production exceeds its marginal social benefit, then more than the efficient about of beer is being produced.(T)(T)仃)13. Efficie nt outcomes ar

37、e ofte n viewed as in equitable.14. I f it is not possible to make some one better off without harm ing ano ther, the n resource allocati on isefficie nt.(T)15. Compensation criteria are used to argue that changes in resource allocati on should be made if the gains to some groups outweigh the losses

38、 to others, eve n though compe nsati on for losses is not actually made.16. All points on a utility possibility curve are efficient but differ in terms of the distributi on of well-be in g.(T)MULTIPLE CHOICEQJESTIONS1. Positive economics:a. makes recomme ndati ons desig ned to achieve certa in goals

39、.b. establishes cause-a nd-effect relati on ships betwee necono mic variables.c. is based on value judgme nts.d. can n ever be used to make predicti ons.2. If the efficie nt output of a good is produced each week, the n the:a. marginal social ben efit of the good equals its marginal social cost each

40、 week.b. marginal social ben efit of the good is at a maximum.c. total social ben efit of the good is at a maximum.d. total social ben efit of the good equals its total social cost.3. If the marginal social ben efit of a good exceeds themarginal social cost at the curre nt mon thly output, the n:a.

41、it will be possible to make buyers of the good better off without harm ing sellers of the good.b. it will be possible to make sellers of the goodbetter off without harm ing buyers of the good.c. either (a) or (b)d. a reducti on in mon thly output will be required forefficie ncy.4. The marginal socia

42、l cost of bread exceeds the marginalsocial ben efit at the curre nt weekly output. Therefore,a. the marginal net ben efit of bread is positive.b. the output of bread is efficie nt.c. a reducti on in weekly output of bread is n ecessary to achieve efficie ncy.d. an in crease in weekly output of bread

43、 is n ecessary to achieve efficie ncy.5. The total social ben efit of automobiles equals the totalsocial cost at curre nt annual output. Then it follows that:a. the annual output of automobiles is efficie nt.b. the annual output of automobiles exceeds the efficie nt amount.c. less tha n the efficie

44、nt annual output of automobiles is produced.d. it is not possible to make buyers of automobiles better off without harming sellers.e. both (a) and (d)6. Eggs are sold in a perfectly competitive market. No pers ons other tha n the buyers and sellers of eggs are affected in any way whe n eggs are trad

45、ed in the market. The n it follows that:a. the price of eggs equals the marginal social cost of eggs.b. the price of eggs equals the marginal social ben efit of eggs.c. the price of eggs exceeds the marginal social ben efit of eggs.d. both (a) and (b)7. Diamonds are sold by a monopoly firm that maxi

46、mizes profits. Then it follows that:a. the marginal social ben efit of diam onds exceeds itsmarg inal social cost.b. the marginal social cost of diam onds exceeds its marg inal social ben efit.c.the price of diam onds equals its marginal social cost.d. the price of diam onds exceeds its marginal soc

47、ial ben efit.e. both (c) and (d)8. Points on a utility possibility curve represent:a. a give n distributi on of well-be ing betwee n two pers ons.b. an efficie nt allocati on of resources.c. the maximum well-be ing of any one pers on, give n the resources available and the well-be ing of ano ther pe

48、rs on.d. all of the above9. If efficie ncy has bee n atta in ed,a. it will be possible to make any one pers on better off without harm ing ano ther.b. it will not be possible to make any one pers on better off without harm ing ano ther.c. perfect competiti on must exist.d. the opport un ity cost of

49、any cha nge in resource use must be zero.10. A move from an inefficient resource allocation to anefficie nt one:a. will always be unanim ously approved, eve n if gainers do not compe nsate losers.b. will be unanim ously opposed.c. will be unanim ously approved if gainers compe nsate losers.d. can n

50、ever result in losers.11. Which of the following is a normative statementa. Whe n in terest rates rise, the qua ntity of loa nable funds dema nded for new mortgages will decli ne.b. To achieve efficie ncy, gover nments should preve nt mon opoly in markets.c. Un employme nt in creases duri ng a reces

51、si on.d. Whe n gover nments in crease in come tax rates, people work less.12. Normative economics:a. is not based on un derly ing value judgme nts.b. makes recomme ndati ons to achieve efficie nt outcomes.c. establishes cause-a nd-effect relati on ships betwee n econo mic variables.d. makes “if then

52、 ” type statements and checks them aga inst the facts.13. The extra ben efit on one more unit of a good or service is its:a. marginal cost.b. marginal ben efit.c. total ben efit.d. total cost.14. I f the efficient output of computers is achieved this year, the n market price of computers is equal to

53、:a. the marginal social ben efit of computers.b. the marginal social cost of computers.c. the total social cost of computers.d. the total social ben efit of computers.e. both (a) and (b)15. Suppose the efficient output currently prevails in the market for ice cream. A tax on ice cream consumption wi

54、ll:a. allow efficie ncy to con ti nue to prevail in the market.b. result in more tha n the efficie nt output in the market.c. result in less tha n the efficie nt output in the market.d. cause the margi nal social cost of ice cream to exceed its marginal social ben efit at the market equilibrium outp

55、ut.ESSAYQJESTIONS1. The wine industry is currently composed of many firms, and wi ne is sold in a perfectly competitive market. The wine in dustry produces the efficie nt annual output of wi ne, which is 100,000 bottles per year. The market equilibrium price is $5 per bottle.a. Draw the market dema

56、nd and supply of wine and label the curves to show why the market output is the efficie nt output.b. Suppose that the wi ne in dustry is con solidated into one large mon opoly firm. As a result oflossthe monopolization of the industry, the price of wine increase to $7 per bottle, and the annual quan

57、tity demanded falls to 75,000 bottles. Explain why this output is not efficient and show the in net benefits resulting from monopolization of the industry.2. Explain why points on a utility possibility curve represent efficient allocations of resources. Why must the utility possibility curve be downward sloping Draw a utility possibility curve and show how it is possible to achieve efficiency by moving from a point within the curve and the axes to a

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论