全文预览已结束
下载本文档
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
附录Philosophy of Structural Design A structural engineering project can be divided into three phases: planning, design, and construction. Structural design involves determining the most suitable proportions of a structure and dimensioning the structural elements and details of which it is composed. This is the most highly technical and mathematical phase of a structural engineering project, but it cannot-and certainly should not-be conducted without being fully coordinated with the planning and construction phases of the project. The successful designer is at all times fully conscious of the various considerations that were involved in the preliminary planning for the structure and, likewise, of the various problems that may later be encountered in its construction. Specially, the structural design of any structure first involves the establishment of the loading and other design conditions that must be resisted by the structure and therefore must be considered in its design. Then comes the analysis (or computation ) of the internal gross forces (thrust, shears, bending moments, and twisting moments), stress intensities, strains, deflections, and reactions produced by the loads, temperature, shrinkage, creep, or other design conditions. Finally comes the proportioning and selection of materials of the members and connections so as to resist adequately the effects produced by the design conditions. The criteria used to judge whether particular proportions will result in the desired behavior reflect accumulated knowledge (theory, field and model tests, and practical experience), intuition, and judgment. For most common civil engineering structures such as bridges and buildings, the usual practice in the past has been to design on the basis of a comparison of allowable stress intensities with those produced by the service loadings and other design conditions. This traditional basis for design is called elastic design because the allowable stress intensities are chosen in accordance with the concept that the stress or strain corresponding to the yield point of the material should not be exceeded at the most highly stressed points of the structure. Of course, the selection of the allowable stresses may also be modified by a consideration of the permissible deflections of the structure. Depending on the type of structure and the conditions involved, the stress intensities computed in the analytical model of the actual structure for the assumed design conditions may or may not be in close agreement with the stress intensities produced in the actual structure by the actual conditions to which it is exposed. The degree of correspondence is not important, provided that the computed stress intensities can be interpreted in terms of previous experience. The selection of the service conditions and the allowable stress intensities provides a margin of safety against failure. The selection of the magnitude of this margin depends on the degree of uncertainty regarding loading, analysis, design, materials, and construction and on the consequences of failure. For example, if an allowable tensile stress of 20000 psi is selected for structural steel with a yield stress of 33000 psi, the margin of safety (or factor of safety) provided against tensile yielding is 33000/20000, or 1.65. The allowable-stress approach has an important disadvantage in that it does not provide a uniform overload capacity for all parts and all types of structures. As a result, there is today a rapidly growing tendency to base the design on the ultimate strength and serviceability of the structure, with the older allowable-stress approach serving as an alternative basis for design. The newer approach currently goes under the name of strength design in reinforce-concrete design literature and plastic design in steel-design literature. When proportioning is done on the strength basis, the anticipated service loading is first multiplied by a suitable load factor (greater than 1), the magnitude of which depends upon the uncertainty of the loading, the possibility of its changing during the life of the structure, and, for a combination of loadings, the likelihood, frequency, and duration of the particular combination. In this approach for reinforced-concrete design, the theoretical capacity of a structural element is reduced by a capacity-reduction factor to provide for small adverse variations in material strengths, workmanship, and dimensions. The structure is then proportioned so that, depending on the governing conditions, the increased load would (1) cause a fatigue or a buckling or a brittle-fracture failure or (2) just produce yielding at one internal section (or simultaneous yielding at several sections) or (3) cause elastic-plastic displacement of the structure or (4) cause the entire structure to be on the point of collapse. Proponents of this latter approach argue that it results in a more realistic design with a more accurately provided margin of strength over the anticipated service conditions. These improvements result from the fact that nonelastic and nonlinear effects that become significant in the vicinity of ultimate behavior of the structure can be accounted for. In recent decades, there has been a growing concern among many prominent engineers that not only is the term “factor of safety” improper and unrealistic, but worse still a structural design philosophy based on this concept leads in most cases to an unduly conservative and therefore uneconomical design, and in some cases to an unconservative design with too high a probability of failure. They argue that there is no such thing as certainty, either of failure or of safety of a structure but only a probability of failure or a probability of safety. They feel, therefore, that the variations of the load effects and the variations of the structural resistance should be studied in a statistical manner and the probability of survival or the probability of serviceability of a structure estimated. It may not yet be practical to apply this approach to the design of each individual structure. However, it is believed to be practical to do so in framing design rules and regulations. It is highly desirable that building codes and specifications plainly state the factors and corresponding probabilities that they imply. If a good alignment requires a curved bridge-over a part or the total length then all external longitudinal lines or edges of the structure should be parallel to the curved axis, thereby following again the guideline of good order. The transverse axis of piers or groups of columns should be rectangular (radial) to the curved axis, unless skew crossings over roads or rivers enforce other directions. The requirements of traffic design result occasionally in very acute angles or in level branching which cause difficulties for the bridge engineer to find pleasing solutions for the bridges.结构设计原理 一个结构设计工程可以被分为三个阶段:计划、设计、施工。 结构设计包含确定结构最合适的比例并且测量单元体的尺寸及其包含的细部。这是一项结构工程中技术性和数学性最强的一个阶段,但是如果不能全面的与计划和施工阶段相协调的话,它是不能被进行的。成功的设计者在任何时候都能全面地考虑到结构初步设计中包含的各种因素,同时还充分考虑到以后施工中可能遇到的各种问题。尤其,任何一个结构的结构设计首先包括结构所必须抵抗的荷载及其它设计因素的确定,因此,在设计中必须考虑到。然后开始分析(或计算)由荷载、收缩、徐变或其它设计因素引起的总内力(推力、剪力、弯矩和扭矩),应力强度、应变、变形及反力等。最后是比例的确定和选择构件和连结件的材料,用来充分的抵抗由设计条件带来的影响效应,这种用来评断特定的比例是否会带来想要的结构的标准反映出你的知识的积累程度、直觉以及判断。常见的土木工程结构例如桥梁、建筑,过去的这种做法是在比较应力强度以及由使用荷载和其它设计因素引起的应力强度的基础上设计的。这种传统的设计被称作弹性设计,因为允许应力强度是按照这样一种理念进行选择的,即材料的拉、压允许应力与屈服强度相同并且不能超过结构的最大应力。当然,考虑到垮塌的可能性及结构的允许变形,对允许应力强度的选择可作适当的修正。根据结构的类型和所包含的条件,对于在假定的条件下在实际结构的分析模型中所计算得的应力强度与在实际的承载条件下实际构件所产生的应力强度可能相似也可能不同。当计算得的应力强度可以被先前的经验所解释和肯定时,这种相似度就不再重要了。使用条件和允许应力强度的选择应该相对垮塌留有一定的安全余地,这种安全余地大小的选择取决于荷载、分析、设计、材料和施工的不确定程度及垮塌将引起的后果。例如:一个允许抗拉强度为20000磅每立方英寸的结构采用抗拉强度为33000磅每立方英寸的钢材,则相对于抗拉屈服强度的安全余地为33000/20000,即1.65。允许应力法有一个严重的缺陷,也就是它不能为各类结构及其构件给出一个统一的超载能力。因此在今天有这样一种快速发展的趋势
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 二年级道德与法治上册 第一单元 3《假期安全真重要》教案4 浙教版
- 八年级英语下册 Unit 1 What's the matter教案设计(pdf)(新版)人教新目标版
- 2024-2025学年新教材高中数学 第1章 空间向量与立体几何 1.4 空间向量的应用 1.4.1 第2课时 空间向量与垂直关系教案 新人教A版选择性必修第一册
- 八年级政治上册 第四单元 9.3 平等尊重你我他教案 新人教版
- 2024-2025学年高中物理 第7章 分子动理论 4 温度和温标教案1 新人教版选修3-3
- 英语 制作课件
- 租地到期收购地面上的房屋合同(2篇)
- 造船厂检修劳务派遣合同(2篇)
- 托尔斯泰课件完美
- 地震说课稿课件
- 吴姓的研究报告
- 开学收心主题班会PPT4
- 2022版《义务教育教学新课程标准》解读课件
- 《汽车安全驾驶培训》课件
- 达人运营计划书
- 师德师风防性侵知识讲座
- 财务法规知识培训课件
- 骨折修复的生物学原理与细胞治疗方法
- 外贸业务基础知识培训
- 幼儿教育专业职业生涯规划书
- 现代化现代性现代主义
评论
0/150
提交评论