




版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
主动脉瓣成形术方法和策略1背景仍是心外科难点术后很大一部分病人病变仍进行性加重需要可靠的技术和治疗策略234外科手术种类主动脉瓣 关闭不全David
:
44
例瓣叶穿孔和撕脱修补:
20
例瓣叶加高和移植:
31
例折叠和悬吊:
101
例主动脉瓣狭窄交界切开:
58
例5结果CPB 时间:
30-270
mins
(102.70
±39.57)阻断时间:15-175
mins
(71.36
±30.90)围术期死亡:
3
例再次手术:
2
例6主动脉瓣狭窄(1)合并其他诊断PDAMIVSDCoAPAPVCASDCoronary
arterial
fistulaPS9515118117主动脉瓣狭窄(2)术前随访无8轻度1635中度2515重度178术前随访P
value瓣环直径(mm)14.38
±3.3814.77±3.240.406窦径(mm)18.53±5.0317.53±3.870.308LVEDd
(mm)34.36±7.7934.79±6.200.775LVEF(%)76.38±6.9172.15±5.870.030室间隔厚度(mm)7.33±2.606.58±0.990.298跨瓣压差(mmHg)77.41±33.6033.80±16.51<0.001主动脉瓣狭窄(3)9主动脉瓣关闭不全:折叠和悬吊(1)合并其他诊断VSDValsava
sinus
rupturePDAASDDORVMIPSSubaortic
stenosis37662155110主动脉瓣关闭不全:折叠和悬吊(2)术前(例)随访(例)微量15少量2063中量6620大量1511主动脉瓣关闭不全:折叠和悬吊(3)12术前随访P
value瓣环直径(mm)19.78
±0.9619.44
±0.600.783窦直径(mm)25.42
±1.2925.06
±0.760.800LVEDd
(mm)50.37
±1.7640.01
±4.91<0.001LVEF(%)64.88
±8.9967.88
±9.520.249主动脉瓣关闭不全:瓣叶加高及移植(1)合并其他诊断VSD
9CoA
1Residue
VSD
and
AV
perforation
2PS2Subaortic
membrane113主动脉瓣关闭不全:瓣叶加高(2)术前(例)随访(例)微量12少量15中量224大量914主动脉瓣关闭不全:瓣叶加高及移植(3)
术前随访P
value瓣环(mm)20.20
±3.1119.60
±3.970.553窦径(mm)28.01
±5.6625.20
±4.490.013LVEDd
(mm)47.11
±9.3640.80
±10.110.004LVEF(%)61.80
±7.4364.40
±6.800.46215主动脉瓣关闭不全:穿孔闭合(1)诊断医源性AI
(
VSD
修补术后)15例SBE3例其他2例16主动脉瓣关闭不全:穿孔闭合(2)术前(例)随访(例)微量4少量313中量113大量617主动脉瓣关闭不全:穿孔闭合(3)
术前随访P
value瓣环(mm)22.21
±2.7723.60
±2.510.423窦径(mm)29.01
±3.5429.80
±3.110.456LVEDd
(mm)56.01
±13.3643.83
±5.230.043LVEF(%)61.33
±6.0363.67
±1.150.57218主动脉瓣关闭不全:David手术15例27例Stanford A型主动脉夹层主动脉根部瘤马凡氏综合征主动脉根部瘤26例大动脉炎主动脉根部瘤1例主动脉瓣二瓣化畸形合并根部瘤 2例19主动脉瓣关闭不全:David
(1)合并手术全主动脉替换术全主动脉弓部替换术1例4例部分主动脉弓部替换术3例CABG腹主动脉替换术1例1例20分组结果:David
(2)手术方法David
I 手术 9例David II手术 30例改良David手术(包裹或三片法) 5例David手术二次瓣膜替换术2例分别于术后10、12月原因分别为无冠瓣和左冠瓣脱垂21分组结果:David
(3)术前(例)随访(例)微量16少量2324中量142大量7222主动脉瓣关闭不全:
David手术术前随访瓣环(mm)3024窦径(mm)4834LVEDd
(mm)463923主动脉瓣关闭不全:
比较传统组延伸组病例数18921年龄(岁)18.60±17.9117.92±16.56体重(Kg)39.01±22.9639.14±23.98CPB
time(min)101.81±40.96110.71±22.76OCLD
time(min)69.81±31.2185.23±24.39主动脉瓣环径21.20±5.4023.52±4.17主动脉窦径27.73±7.4530.18±6.64升主动脉径24.39±6.4423.69±7.63死亡30
24危险因素分析25危险因素Wald
x2偏回归系数OR值P值Ao窦径8.0520.21981.2460.0014瓣环径7.9430.39871.351<0.0001瓣叶加高4.830-0.98980.3720.028进行Logistic统计分析,发现术后主动脉瓣反流与主动脉瓣环内径、窦部内径、瓣叶加高手术方式显著相关,前两者均为危险因素,而瓣叶加高为保护性因素讨论达到主动脉瓣正常功能的理想几何形态CLASS瓣叶交界瓣叶瓣环Valsava
窦窦管交界区26讨论主动脉瓣狭窄:球囊扩张还是主动脉瓣切开成形主动脉瓣关闭不全交界悬吊使瓣叶折叠瓣叶切薄或切除增厚瓣叶或部分交界缝合矩形切除后将剩余瓣叶成形修补穿孔的瓣叶瓣叶加高27讨论28瓣叶折叠圆形瓣环成形讨论29自体心包加高瓣叶讨论矩形切除30讨论危险因素分析瓣环和窦管交界大小是独立危险因素在处理瓣叶病变的同时要注意对两个部分的处理瓣叶加高简单安全有效增加瓣叶高度增加交界长度产生更多的接触面积31讨论David 手术适应症:主动脉瓣瓣叶正常的主动脉扩张性疾病升主动脉或主动脉根部瘤结缔组织疾病导致的根部扩张(Marfan
综合征)主动脉夹层累及主动脉根部32讨论
再植
(Reimplantation)
防止主动脉瓣瓣环扩张
操作复杂
主动脉瓣与人工血管“撞击”
成形
(Remodeling)
操作简便
主动脉瓣的开闭过程更符合生理
窦部和窦管交界有再度扩张可能33讨论改良David手术有利于主动脉瓣和瓣环处理操作方便 显露完全 成形充分个性化重建窦部选择性重建部分窦部可防止窦管交界扩张34结论对于主动脉瓣叶菲薄、柔软、无钙化挛缩的患者可以施行主动脉成形术对于主动脉根部扩张性疾病所引起的主动脉瓣正常的关闭不全患者,David手术是一种安全有效的选择而对于主动脉瓣叶脱垂的患者,应该同时注意瓣叶的修复与窦管部的处理瓣叶的加高是一种简单、安全、更加有效的手术方式。3536Aortic
Valve
RepairPortfolio
StrategyWei
WangFuwai
HospitalCAMS
&
PUMC37BackgroundRemains
a
surgical
challengeHigh
rate
of
progressive
failureStrong
incentive
to
develop
reliabletechniques
and
strategy38Retrograde
Analysis254
cases
(Oct
1996-Dec
2007)Male/Female:
170/84Age:
median
18.53
±17.74(0.1-73years)Wt:
median
39.09
±23.01(3.4-89kg)Follow
up:
6-121
monthsFu
WaiExperience39PathologyCusp
pathologyProlapse
of
cusp
tissueCusp
perforation
or
retractionBicuspid
anatomyDilatation
of
the
aortic
annular
(root)Combination
of
both
root
and
cusp
pathologyThe
leaflet
is
slight
and
soft
,without
calcification
andContracture40Surgical
CategoryAortic
insufficiencyDavid
: 44
casesClosure
of
tear
and
perforation:
20
casesLeaflet
extension
and
cusp
transplantation:
31
casesPlication
and
suspension:
101
casesAortic
stenosisCommissurotomy:
58
cases41ResultsCPB
periods:30-270
mins
(102.70
±39.57)Aortic
clamping
periods:15-175
mins
(71.36±30.90)Operative
death:
3
casesRe-operation:
2cases42Subgroup
results:AS
(1)Concomitant
diagnosisPDAMIVSDCoAPAPVCASDCoronary
arterial
fistulaPS95151181143Subgroup
results:AS
(2)PreoperationFollow-upTrivial8Mild1635Moderated2515Severe1744PreoperationFollow
upP
valueDiameter
ofAnnulus
(mm)14.38
±3.3814.77±3.240.406Diameter
ofSinus(mm)18.53±5.0317.53±3.870.308LVEDd
(mm)34.36±7.7934.79±6.200.775LVEF(%)76.38±6.9172.15±5.870.030Ventricular
septal(mm)7.33±2.606.58±0.990.298Transvalvulargradient77.41±33.6033.80±16.51<0.00145Subgroup
results:AS
(3)AI:
Plicate
and
suspension(1)Concomitant
diagnosisVSDValsava
sinus
rupturePDAASDDORVMIPSSubaortic
stenosis37662155146AI:
Plicate
and
suspension(2)PreoperationFollow-upTrivial15Mild2063Moderated6620Severe1547AI:
Plicate
and
suspension(3)PreoperationFollow
upP
valueDiameter
ofAnnulus
(mm)19.78
±0.9619.44
±0.600.783Diameter
ofAnnulus(mm)25.42
±1.2925.06
±0.760.800LVEDd
(mm)50.37
±1.7640.01
±4.91<0.001LVEF(%)64.88
±8.9967.88
±9.520.24948AI:
Leaflet
extension(1)Concomitant
diagnosisVSD
9CoA
1Residue
VSD
and
AV
perforation
2PS2Subaortic
membrane149AI:
Leaflet
extension(2)PreoperationFollow-upTrivial12Mild15Moderated224Severe950AI:
Leaflet
extension(3)
PreoperationFollow
upP
valueDiameter
ofAnnulus
(mm)20.20
±3.1119.60
±3.970.553Diameter
ofAnnulus(mm)28.01
±5.6625.20
±4.490.013LVEDd
(mm)47.11
±9.3640.80
±10.110.004LVEF(%)61.80
±7.4364.40
±6.800.46251AI:
Perforation
closure(1)DiagnosisIatrogenic
AI15(
Post
VSD
repair
)SBE3Others252AI:
Perforation
closure(2)PreoperationFollow-upTrivial4Mild313Moderated113Severe653AI:Perforation
closure(3)
PreoperationFollow
upP
valueDiameter
ofAnnulus
(mm)22.21
±2.7723.60
±2.510.423Diameter
ofsinus(mm)29.01
±3.5429.80
±3.110.456LVEDd
(mm)56.01
±13.3643.83
±5.230.043LVEF(%)61.33
±6.0363.67
±1.150.57254AI:
DavidStanford
type
A
aortic
dissection:15
casesAortic
root
aneurysm:Marfan
syndrome:Arteritis:27cases26cases1
caseBicuspid
with
Aortic
root
aneurysm:
2
cases55AI:
David
(1)Concomitant
diagnosisTotal
aorta
replacement:Total
archreplacement:Hemi-arch
replacement:CABG
:Abdominal
aorta
replacement:1case4cases3cases1case1case56AI:
David
(2)Type
ofoperationDavid
I
:David
II:Modified
David
:9cases30cases5casesReoperation
for
valve
replacement
after
David
opertation:2cases10
and
12
months
post-operationlyProlapse
of
non-coronary
leaflet
and
left-coronaryleaflet57AI:
David
(3)PreoperationFollow-upTrivial16Mild2324Moderated142Severe7258AI:
DavidPatient
Diagnosis:PreoperationFollow
upDiameter
ofAnnulus
(mm)3024Diameter
ofsinus(mm)4834LVEDd
(mm)463959AI:
ComparisonPlicationExtensioncases18921Age
(years)18.60±17.9117.92±16.56weight(Kg)39.01±22.9639.14±23.98CPB
time(min)101.81±40.96110.71±22.76OCLD
time(min)69.81±31.2185.23±24.39Diameter
of
Annulus21.20±5.4023.52±4.17Diameter
of
Sinus27.73±7.4530.18±6.64Diameter
of
Ao(mm)24.39±6.4423.69±7.63death30
60Risk
FactorsAnalysis61Risk
factorsWald
x2Partial
regressioncoefficientORvalueP
valueDiameter
ofSinus8.0520.21981.2460.0014Diameterof
Annulus7.9430.39871.351<0.0001Leafletextension4.830-0.98980.3720.028By
logistic
statistical
analysis,it
is
found
that
aortic
regurgitationpostoperationly
is
correlative
evidently
with
diameter
of
annulus
anddiameter
of
sinus
and
leaflet
extension
procedure.The
former
twoarerisk
factors
,as
the
leaflet
extension
is
protective
factor。DiscussionIdeal
geometry
to
achieve
aortic
valvecompetence
CLASSCommissuresLeafletsAnnulusSinuses
of
valsavaSinotubular
region62DiscussionAortic
stenosis:
Balloon
or
surgical
valvotomyAortic
regurgitationLeaflet
plication
with
commissure
resuspensionLeaflet
thinning,
release
of
thickend
leaflets,orpartial
commissure
closureTriangular
resection
and
repair
ofredundantleafletsRepair
of
torn
or
perforated
leafletsAortic
cusp
extension63Discussion64Commissural
plicationCircular
annularplastyDiscussion65Leaflet
extension
using
autologous
pericardiumDiscussionTriangularresection66DiscussionRisk Analysis:
Both
annulus
and
ST
junctionsize
are
independent
risk
factorsLeaflet
extension
procedure
is
a
simple,safeand
effective
choiceincrease
the
height
of
the
leafletsIncrease
commissurescreating
an
additional
area
of
coaptation.67DiscussionIndication
of
David
procedure
:aortic
rootdilation
with
normal
leafletAscending
Aortic
aneurysm
or
aorticrootaneurysmaortic
root
dilation
arise from
connectivetissue
disease
(Marfan)Aortic
dissection
involving
aortic
root68Discussion69
Reimplantation
Prevent
dilationof aortic
annulus
Complex
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 2025年中国来电显示电话机市场调查研究报告
- 2025年中国木浆小盘纸数据监测研究报告
- 2025年中国有源射频收发器集成电路市场调查研究报告
- 2025年中国智能数字光柱显示调节仪数据监测研究报告
- 2025年中国无尘布切割机市场调查研究报告
- 2025年中国无刷电动螺丝批市场调查研究报告
- 2025年中国新型手摇二折床市场调查研究报告
- 2025年中国数字显示滑动式剖面沉降仪数据监测报告
- 2025至2031年中国精密微型互感器行业投资前景及策略咨询研究报告
- 2025年中国工艺篮市场调查研究报告
- 2025年中国防晒护理洗发露市场调查研究报告
- 2025-2030中国太阳能照明系统行业市场发展趋势与前景展望战略研究报告
- 2025年陕西省普通高中学业水平合格考试模拟卷(五)历史试题(含答案)
- 2025年有关“我为群众办实事”主题日活动工作方案
- 油气管道输送试题及答案
- 2025-2030中国非邻苯二甲酸酯类增塑剂行业市场发展趋势与前景展望战略研究报告
- 2025年台球理论测试题及答案
- 2024-2025学年新教材高中数学 第4章 概率与统计 4.3 统计模型 4.3.1 第2课时 相关系数与非线性回归说课稿 新人教B版选择性必修第二册
- 虚拟电厂接入配电网电力系统调度优化
- 用户能耗监测的智能插座原型设计
- 新能源汽车废旧动力电池综合利用行业规范条件(2024年本)
评论
0/150
提交评论