




版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
POLICYBRIEF
Australia’sSouthChinaSeachallenges
MALCOLMCOOK
MAY2021
AUSTRALIA’SSOUTHCHINASEACHALLENGES
TheLowyInstituteisanindependentpolicythinktank.ItsmandaterangesacrossallthedimensionsofinternationalpolicydebateinAustralia—economic,politicalandstrategic—anditisnotlimitedtoaparticulargeographicregion.Itstwocoretasksareto:
producedistinctiveresearchandfreshpolicyoptionsforAustralia’sinternationalpolicyandtocontributetothewiderinternationaldebate
promotediscussionofAustralia’sroleintheworldbyprovidinganaccessibleandhigh-qualityforumfordiscussionofAustralianinternationalrelationsthroughdebates,seminars,lectures,dialoguesandconferences.
LowyInstitutePolicyBriefsaredesignedtoaddressaparticular,currentpolicyissueandtosuggestsolutions.Theyaredeliberatelyprescriptive,specificallyaddressingtwoquestions:Whatistheproblem?Whatshouldbedone?
Theviewsexpressedinthispaperareentirelytheauthors’ownandnotthoseoftheLowyInstitute.
POLICYBRIEF
AUSTRALIA’SSOUTHCHINASEACHALLENGES
KEYFINDINGS
ChinawillnotagreetoaSouthChinaSeaCodeofConduct
(COC)thatisconsistentwiththe2016SouthChinaSeaarbitraltribunalruling,andthereforeanyCOCwhichChinaagreeswiththeAssociationofSoutheastAsianNations(ASEAN)willharmAustralia’sinterests.ButalackofAustraliansupportforsuchaCodewouldaggravaterelationswithSoutheastAsianstatesandASEAN,andwithChina.
Australiashouldusethetimeaffordedbythedrawn-outCodeofConductnegotiationstocoordinatewiththefivelittoral
SoutheastAsianstatesaffectedbyChina’sunlawfulmaritimeclaims.Australiashouldemphasisetheneedforconsistencywithinternationallaw,especiallythe2016arbitralruling.
TheBidenadministrationislikelytoincreasepressureon
Australiatoconductfreedomofnavigationoperations
(FONOPS)intheSouthChinaSea.SuchactionmayriskasignificantChineseresponseagainstAustralia.
POLICYBRIEF
1
AUSTRALIA’SSOUTHCHINASEACHALLENGES
EXECUTIVESUMMARY
Whatistheproblem?
Australia’scurrentSouthChinaSeapoliciesareunderstrainfromtwosides.OntheChinaside,BeijingwillnotagreetoanyCodeofConductthatisconsistentwiththearbitraltribunalrulingitrejects.IftheASEANmemberstatesagreetosuchaCodeofConduct,Australiacannotsupportit.OntheUSside,thereisanincreasinglikelihoodthattheBidenadministrationwillplacemorepressureonAustraliatoconductfreedomofnavigationoperations(FONOPs)insupportofthe2016UnitedNationsConventionontheLawoftheSea(UNCLOS)ruling,forcingAustraliatochoosebetweendamagingourrelationswithChinaorrejectingarequestfromtheUnitedStates.
Whatshouldbedone?
AustraliashouldcoordinatewithwillingSoutheastAsianlittoralstatestoinfluencefutureCodeofConductnegotiationsandencouragestatesnottosignuptoitifthelikelyCodeisnotconsistentwiththe2016arbitraltribunalruling.
AustraliashouldnotconductFONOPsintheSouthChinaSeathatpasswithin12nauticalmilesoffeaturesclaimedbyChina.Rather,AustraliashouldparticipateinbilateralandminilateralnavalexerciseswithwillingSoutheastAsianlittoralstatesintheirrespectiveexclusiveeconomiczonesintheSouthChinaSea;itshoulddothismoreoftenandmorepublicly.
AustraliashouldadvocateforregularQuadrilateralSecurityDialogue(Quad)Leaders’SummitsandinclusionofChina’sunlawfulmaritimeclaimsandactivitiesintheSouthChinaSeaontheagenda.
ThesepolicyadjustmentsshouldadvanceAustralia’sinterestsinstrengtheningSoutheastAsianlittoralstates’handsinCodeofConductnegotiationswithChina,moderatepressuretoconductFONOPsintheSouthChinaSea,andreducethelikelihoodandscaleofChinesepunitivemeasuresagainstAustralia.
POLICYBRIEF
AUSTRALIA’SSOUTHCHINASEACHALLENGES
INTRODUCTION
AkeytestofChina’swillingnesstoacceptthecurrentrules-basedorderisthewayithandlesitsdisputeswithfiveSoutheastAsianlittoralstates(Brunei,Indonesia,Malaysia,thePhilippines,andVietnam)intheSouthChinaSea.ChinaisfailingthistestasitseekseffectivecontroloftheSea—avitalconduitofinternationaltrade.
Overthepastdecade,Chinahasmoreaggressivelypusheditsunlawful‘nine-dashline’
1
maritimeclaimsintheSouthChinaSea—anapproachthatviolatesthemaritimeandsovereignrightsofthesefiveSoutheastAsianlittoralstates.ThisposesadirectchallengetoAustralia’ssupportfortherules-basedorderandits“deepstakeinthesecurityofSoutheastAsia”.
2
China’saggressiveapproachhasbecomeagreaterconcerninAustralia’srelationswithChina,theUnitedStates,SoutheastAsianlittoralstates,andASEAN,sinceChina’sartificialisland-buildingcampaignintheSpratlysfrom2013.
3
ThishasmadetheSouthChinaSeaanincreasinglyimportantarenaforthemountingUS–Chinarivalry.
POLICYBRIEF
3
AUSTRALIA’SSOUTHCHINASEACHALLENGES
TheUnitedStatesexercisesitsfreedomofnavigationandoverflightrightsintheSouthChinaSeatocontestChina’sclaimsandoffersupporttoSoutheastAsianlittoralstates.
SoutheastAsianlittoralstateshavereactedunevenlytoChina’sescalatingaggressioninadvancingitsunlawfulclaimsintheSouthChinaSea,buthavemostlysoughttodefendtheirsovereignandmaritimerights,individuallyandthroughASEAN.Atthesametime,USFONOPschallengingtheseChineseclaimshavebecomemorefrequentandpublic.
AustraliahassupportedtheeffortsofitsSoutheastAsianneighbours,andmayberequiredtodomoreofthisinthecomingyears.Todate,theAustraliangovernmenthasresistedcallstoconductFONOPsthatcouldprovokeapunitiveChineseresponse;ChinesestatemediahaswarnedthatRoyalAustralianNavypresenceoperationsintheSouthChinaSeaareatriskofChineseattack.
4
ThePhilippinesinstitutedarbitralproceedingsagainstChinaundertheUnitedNationsConventionontheLawoftheSea(UNCLOS)inJanuary2013.ThePhilippines’delegation(pictured)attendedtheMeritsHearinginNovember2015,andin2016thearbitraltribunalruledoverwhelminglyinfavourofthePhilippines.Image:CourtesyPermanentCourtofArbitration.
China’smoreaggressiveapproachhasbecomecleareroverthepastdecade.ThisbeganwithChinesepatrolboatsharassingaseismicsurveyvesselaroundReedBankonthePhilippinecontinentalshelfintheSouthChinaSeain2011.
5
Thefollowingyear,Chinaforcefully
POLICYBRIEF
ThePhilippinesacceptedtheUNCLOSrulingasfinalandbindingonthePhilippinesandChina.Chinarejecteditoutright.
AUSTRALIA’SSOUTHCHINASEACHALLENGES
assertedcontrolofScarboroughShoalinthePhilippineexclusiveeconomiczoneintheSouthChinaSea.
6
TheseeventsledthePhilippinestofileanarbitrationcaseunderUNCLOSagainstChinainJanuary2013,arguingthatChinawasviolatingPhilippinesovereignandmaritimerightsinthePhilippineexclusiveeconomiczoneintheSouthChinaSea.ChinaattemptedtoavoidthearbitraltribunalbyarguingthatasystemforresolvingdisputesintheSouthChinaSeaalreadyexistedthroughvariousinstruments,includingthe2002China–ASEANDeclarationontheConductofPartiesintheSouthChinaSea(DOC).
7
TheJuly2016arbitraltribunalrulingupheldthePhilippinecaseagainst
China.
8
Thetribunal:
rejectedChina’sjurisdictionalargument,rulingtheDOCapolitical,non-bindingagreementwhichdidnotexcludeothermeansofdisputeresolution;
acknowledgedthatthethirdpartyinterventionsofVietnam,Malaysia,andIndonesiaintheproceedingssupportedthevalidityofthePhilippinecase;
concludedthatChinahadviolatedthePhilippines’sovereignrightsinthePhilippineexclusiveeconomiczoneintheSouth
ChinaSea;
foundthatthereisnolegalbasisforChinatoclaimhistoricrightstoresourceswithinthe‘nine-dashline’;and
foundthat“noneoftheSpratlyIslandsiscapableofgeneratingextendedmaritimezones”,and“theSpratlyIslandscannotgeneratemaritimezonescollectivelyasaunit”.
ThePhilippinesacceptedtheUNCLOSrulingasfinalandbindingonthePhilippinesandChina.Chinarejecteditoutright.
POLICYBRIEF
5
AUSTRALIA’SSOUTHCHINASEACHALLENGES
AUSTRALIA’SPOSITIONONTHEUNCLOSRULING
OnthedayoftheUNCLOSruling,Australiacalledon“thePhilippinesandChinatoabidebytheruling,whichisfinalandbindingonbothparties”.
9
Australiahasrepeatedlyreaffirmedthisposition,ashavethePhilippines,theUnitedStates,andJapan.
TheopposingpositionsofAustraliaandChinaontheUNCLOSrulinghavebeenasignificantfactorindeterioratingAustralia–Chinarelations.ButCanberrahasnotsteppedback.Australia’s23July2020NoteVerbaletotheSecretary-GeneraloftheUnitedNationsrejectedChina’sargumentsagainsttheUNCLOSrulingandaffirmeditsfinalandbindingnature.
10
Inthenownotoriouslistof14AustralianbehavioursthatBeijingclaimedinNovember2020are“poisoningbilateralrelations”,seventhwasthatAustraliawas“thefirstnon-littoralcountrytomakeastatementontheSouthChinaSeatotheUnitedNations”.
11
MostSoutheastAsianstates’responsestotheUNCLOSrulinghavebeenlessdirectandcategoricalthanAustralia’s.
12
ASEAN,aconsensus-constrainedbody,hasnotreferredtotheUNCLOSruling.ThatmaybebecauseofPrimeMinisterHunSenofCambodia—leaderoftheSoutheastAsianstateperceivedasthemostcloselyalignedwithChina.In2016,hereportedlylabelledtheruling“theworstpoliticalcollusionintheframeworkofinternationalpolitics”,andopposed“anydeclarationbyASEANtosupporttheverdictinrelationtotheSouthChinaSeadisputes”.
13
ThesevaryingresponseshavecreatedtheimpressionthatAustralia,theUnitedStates,andJapansupporttheUNCLOSrulingmorethantheSoutheastAsianlittoralstatesthatdirectlybenefitfromit.Butthisperceptionmaybechanging.Indonesia’s26May2020NoteVerbaletotheSecretary-GeneraloftheUnitedNationscitedtheUNCLOSrulingasconfirmingIndonesia’spositionon“themaritimeentitlementsofthemaritimefeatures”,andthatChina’s“Nine-DashLinemapimplyinghistoricrightsclaimclearlylacksinternationallegalbasisandistantamounttoupset[ting]UNCLOS1982”.
14
POLICYBRIEF
TheopposingpositionsofAustraliaandChinaontheUNCLOSrulinghavebeenasignificantfactorindeterioratingAustralia–Chinarelations.
RegionaleliteandPhilippinepublicopinionpollingalsoshowstrongsupportfortheUNCLOSrulingandaCOC.
AUSTRALIA’SSOUTHCHINASEACHALLENGES
On22September2020,PhilippinePresidentRodrigoDuterte,duringhisfirstaddresstotheUnitedNationsGeneralAssembly,calledonChinatoaccepttheUNCLOSrulinginthestrongesttermshehasused.
15
Previously,DutertehadsaidinDecember2016thathewould“setaside”thisrulingtoimproverelationswithChina.
16
RegionaleliteandPhilippinepublicopinionpollingalsoshowstrongsupportfortheUNCLOSrulingandaCOCconsistentwithit:
IntheISEASStateofSoutheastAsia:2021Survey
17
ofregionalelites,85percentofrespondentsfromthetenASEANmemberstatesagreedthat“ASEANshouldtakeaprincipledstandthatupholdsinternationallaw,includingUNCLOS,andrespectthe2016arbitraltribunalruling.”Inthesamereport,100percentofPhilippine,91percentofVietnamese,91percentofIndonesian,and90percentofBruneianrespondentsagreed.Almost81percentofallrespondentsagreedthat“theCOCmustbealignedwithinternationallawincludingUNCLOS”;
InaJuly2020SocialWeatherStationspoll,70percentofadult
Filipinoswantedtheirgovernmenttoasserttheirrightsinthe
WestPhilippineSea(thelocalnameforthePhilippineexclusiveeconomiczoneintheSouthChinaSea),against13percentwhodisagreed.Fouroutoffiveagreedthat“ThePhilippinesshouldformallianceswithotherdemocraticcountriesthatarereadytohelpindefendingourterritorialrightsintheWest
PhilippineSea.”
18
MorefrequentpollingontheUNCLOSrulingandtheCOCinandacrossthePhilippines,Vietnam,Indonesia,Malaysia,andBruneiislikelytoshowverysimilarlevelsofsupportfortheUNCLOSrulingandaCOCbasedonit.New,corroboratedpollingdatawouldstrengthenthepositionoflittoralstatesinCOCnegotiationsandpressuretheirgovernmentsnottoconcede.
POLICYBRIEF
7
AUSTRALIA’SSOUTHCHINASEACHALLENGES
AUSTRALIA’SCOMINGCHALLENGES
TheUNCLOSrulingandChina’srejectionofitframetwoloomingchallengestoAustralia’sSouthChinaSeapolicies:apossibleCodeofConductintheSouthChinaSeabetweenASEANandChina(theCOC);andthelikelihoodofincreasedUSpressureonAustraliatoconductFONOPswithin12nauticalmilesofChinese-claimedfeaturesintheareascoveredbytheUNCLOSruling.
COCChallenge
TheoriginoftheCOCundernegotiationisinChina.In1995,ChinatookcontrolofMischiefReef,alow-tidefeatureinthePhilippineexclusiveeconomiczoneintheSouthChinaSea.ThisprovocativeactspurredSoutheastAsianlittoralstates,throughASEAN,tocallforaCOCwithChinatolowertensionsandtheriskofconflict.In2002,ASEANandChinaagreedtotheinterimDOCthatstated:
“ThePartiesconcernedreaffirmthattheadoptionofacodeofconductintheSouthChinaSeawouldfurtherpromotepeaceandstabilityintheregionandagreetowork,onthebasisofconsensus,towardstheeventualattainmentofthisobjective.”
19
NegotiationsstalledforoveradecadeuntilthePhilippinesfileditsarbitrationcaseinJanuary2013.On2April2013Chinaannounceditswillingnesstorestart“consultations”ontheCOC.SincetheUNCLOSrulingagainstChina,Beijinghaspushedforthenegotiationstomovefaster.On13November2018,ChinesePremierLiKeqiangcalledontheparties“tostrivetoconcludeconsultationsonacodeofconductinthreeyears’timeonthebasisofconsensus”.
20
China’sthree-yeartimelinewillnotbemet.Noface-to-facenegotiationshavetakenplacesinceearly2020duetotheCOVID-19pandemic.However,China’sinterestintheCOChelpsdeflectattentionawayfromBeijing’srejectionofthisrulingandadvancesChina’spositionthattheSouthChinaSeadisputesdonotandshouldnotinterestorinvolve‘non-regional’powerslikeAustralia.
21
ThecourseofCOCnegotiationssince2013hasreinforcedassumptionsthatChinawillnotagreetoanyCOCthatisconsistentwiththeUNCLOSrulingorthatwillonlyincludeissuesnotcoveredbytheruling.Instead,theysuggestthatChinawillusetheCOCtocounter
POLICYBRIEF
SincetheUNCLOSrulingagainstChina,Beijinghaspushedforthenegotiationstomovefaster.
AUSTRALIA’SSOUTHCHINASEACHALLENGES
futureUNCLOScasesagainstitintheSouthChinaSea,andunderminetheSouthChinaSeainterestsof‘non-regional’powers.
China’sproposedCOCtextbecamepublicintheAugust2018COC“SingleDraftNegotiatingText”asagreedbetweenChinaandtheASEANmemberstates.Itsprovisionswouldpreventallpartiesfromcooperatinginmarineeconomicactivitywithcompaniesfrom“outsidetheregion”,andwouldrequirepartiestonotifyeachotherofanymilitaryexerciseswithcountriesfrom“outsidetheregion”thatothersignatoriescouldreject.
22
China’srecentSouthChinaSeaactivitiesareconsistentwiththoseprovisions—theyincludeongoingharassmentofenergyprojectsinvolving“companiesfromoutsidetheregion”inthePhilippine,Vietnamese,andMalaysianexclusiveeconomiczonesintheSouthChinaSea.OneexampleofmanyistheNovember2020incidentinwhichaChinaCoastGuardship“harassedadrillingriganditssupplyshipsoperatingjust44nauticalmilesfromMalaysia’sSarawakState”.
23
The32ndASEAN–AustraliaForumCo-Chairs’Summarywasheldviavideoconferenceon18May2020todiscuss,amongothermatters,asharedcommitment“topromoteanopen,stableandprosperousregion”.Image:CourtesyASEAN/.
Reflectingthesedevelopments,Australia’ssupportfortheCOChasbecomemoreconditional.TheCo-Chairs’Summaryofthe32ndASEAN–AustraliaForumon18May2020statesthat:
“AustraliaexpresseditsexpectationthattheCOCwouldbeconsistentwithinternationallawincludingUNCLOS,notprejudicetheinterestsof
POLICYBRIEF
9
AUSTRALIA’SSOUTHCHINASEACHALLENGES
thirdparties,andreinforceandnotundermineexisting,inclusiveregionalarchitecture.”
24
China’sproposedtextfortheCOCisinconsistentwiththeseAustralianexpectations.Australia’sinterestsmaythereforebebetterservedbyhavingnoCOCatall,ratherthanaCOCthatChinawouldbepreparedtosign.
FONOPsChallenge
AfterthePhilippinesfileditsarbitrationcaseagainstChinaunderUNCLOSinJanuary2013,theUnitedStatesbegantomakepublicitsFONOPsthatchallengeChina’sexcessivemaritimeclaimsintheSouthChinaSea.ThesehaveincludedUSwarshipssailingwithin12nauticalmilesoflow-tidefeaturesthatChinahasdevelopedintofortifiedartificialislands.UnderUNCLOS,suchfeatureshavenoterritorialseasoftheirown.
25
Asexpected,ChinahascastigatedtheseUSoperationsandcitedthemasapretextforfurthermilitarisingitsartificialislands.AftertheUNCLOSruling,undertheTrumpadministration,theseoperationsbecamemorefrequent.
TheUnitedStatesistheonlycountrythathasacknowledgedconductingthesetypesofoperations.AustraliaresistedtheObamaandTrumpadministrations’encouragementforotherlike-mindedstatestoconductsimilaroperations.FormerPrimeMinisterMalcolmTurnbullnotesinhisautobiographythathe“consideredundertakingsuchfreedomofnavigationoperations(FONOPs),butwasunsurewhethertheAmericans,underBarackObama,wouldactuallybackusifwedid.”
26
VoicesonbothsidesoftheAustralianparliamenthavecalledforsuchoperationsbyAustralia.ThedayaftertheUNCLOSruling’srelease,Australia’sshadowdefenceminister,LaborSenatorStephenConroy,calledontheRoyalAustralianNavytosailwithin12nauticalmilesofChinese-controlledlow-tideelevations.
27
However,soonafter,theOppositionappearedtosoftenthisposition.
28
AdvocatesforAustralianFONOPsextendbeyondtheparliamentarychamber.On7March2018,formerDefenceSecretaryDennisRichardsonpubliclyremarked:
“IbelieveweshouldbeconductingfreedomofnavigationexercisesthroughterritorialseasclaimedbyChina,generatedbyman-madefeatures.They[China]havetherighttobeintheSouthChinaSea,but
POLICYBRIEF
Asexpected,ChinahascastigatedtheseUSoperationsandcitedthemasapretextforfurthermilitarisingitsartificialislands.
AUSTRALIA’SSOUTHCHINASEACHALLENGES
theydon’thavearighttocreateman-madefeaturesandseektoassertterritorialwatersfromthose.”
29
ForeignMinisterBishopresponded:
“Wewillcontinuetoexerciseourrightstofreedomofnavigation,pursuanttointernationallaw,aswehavealwaysdoneandwewillcontinuetodoso.Whatwewon’tdoisunilaterallyprovokeanincreaseintensionsintheSouthChinaSea.”
30
HMASBallaratandherembarkedMH-60RhelicopteroperateintheSouthChinaSeaPassage.ThevesselispartofaregionalpresencedeploymentwhereoperationsarebeingconductedwithpartnersacrossNortheastandSoutheastAsiaandtheNortheastIndianOcean.Image:LSISThomasSawtell/D.au.
POLICYBRIEF
11
AUSTRALIA’SSOUTHCHINASEACHALLENGES
TheTrumpadministration,whileseeminglyunilateralistanddismissiveofUSalliances,encouragedAustraliatoconductFONOPsintheSouthChinaSea.TheBidenadministrationmaybemoreinsistent.Becauseitismoremultilateralistandpro-alliances,itwillwantitsalliestodomore.
InthefirstmonthsofthenewBidenadministration,threeoftheseoperationshavebeenmadepublic,suggestingthattherewillbenolet-upinUSFONOPsthataccordwiththeUNCLOSruling.Intheir16April2021JointLeaders’Statement,USPresidentBidenandPrimeMinisterSugaofJapanreaffirmedtheir“objectionstoChina’sunlawfulmaritimeclaimsandactivitiesintheSouthChinaSea”andtheir“strongsharedinterestinafreeandopenSouthChinaSeagovernedbyinternationallaw,inwhichfreedomofnavigationandoverflightareguaranteed”.
31
TwoseniorBidenadministrationappointeeshaveparticularexpertiseandinterestintheSouthChinaSeadisputesandmayadvocateforamorerobustUSandalliedpositiononthesedisputes.
ElyRatner,whoworkedwithBidenwhenhewasasenatorandvicepresident,isBiden’snomineeforAssistantSecretaryofDefenseforIndo-PacificaffairsandleadstheDepartment’snewChinataskforce.Ina2017ForeignAffairsarticle,Ratnerarguedforamoreforward-leaningUSpolicyontheSouthChinaSeaandclosercooperationwithAustraliaifChinaweretodeployadvancedmilitarycapabilitiestoitsartificialislandsintheSpratlys.
32
Chinahasdoneso.
KurtCampbellisthefirstIndo-PacificCoordinatorattheNationalSecurityCouncil.CampbellisastrongsupporteroftheUS–AustraliaallianceandofalliedcooperationinAsia.In2019,CampbellandJakeSullivan,nowBiden’sNationalSecurityAdvisor,outlinedafutureChinastrategyfortheUnitedStates“thatmuststartwithallies”andseek“asteadystateofclear-eyedcoexistence[withChina]ontermsfavourabletoUSinterestsandvalues”.
33
Campbell,asAssistantSecretaryofStateforEastAsianandPacificAffairs,wasintimatelyinvolvedinthefailednegotiationstostopChinatakingcontrolofScarboroughShoalin2012.
USpressureonAustraliatoconductFONOPswithin12nauticalmilesofChina-claimedlandfeaturesintheSouthChinaSea,andthedebateinAustraliaaboutthese,islikelytomountinthecomingyears.
TwoseniorBidenadministrationappointeeshaveparticularexpertiseandinterestintheSouthChinaSeadisputesandmayadvocateforamorerobustUSandalliedpositiononthesedisputes.
POLICYBRIEF
OperationGatewayisAustralia’smainprogramofpresenceoperationsinmaritimeSoutheastAsia.
AUSTRALIA’SSOUTHCHINASEACHALLENGES
WHATAUSTRALIASHOULDDO:
POLICYRECOMMENDATIONS
CoordinatestatementswithSoutheastAsianlittoralstatesonChineseactivitiesinconsistentwiththeUNCLOSruling
AustraliashouldcoordinatewithSoutheastAsianlittoralstatesthatarewillingtocriticiseChineseactivitiesinconsistentwiththeUNCLOSruling,andissuesupportingstatements.CoordinationonstatementscanbedonefromCanberraorthroughAustralianmissions.SuchstatementswouldreinforceAustralia’spositionontheUNCLOSrulingandAustralia’srelationswiththeinfringed-uponSoutheastAsianlittoralstates.
InMarch2021,AustraliajoinedtheUnitedStates,Japan,theEuropeanUnion,andCanadainaPhilippines-ledcriticismofthemassingofChinesevesselsaroundWhitsunReefinthePhilippineexclusiveeconomiczoneoftheSouthChinaSea.Chinarebuffedthesestatementsofsupport,describingthemasbeingcoordinatedand“irresponsible”.
34
Themorecountriesissuesuchstatements,individuallyoringroups,themoreeffectiveeachwillbeinreducingthelikelihoodandscaleofChinesepunitivemeasuresagainstanyofthem.
DonotconductFONOPswithin12nauticalmilesofChinese-claimedfeaturesintheSouthChinaSea
AustraliashouldcontinuetoresistanyUSpressuretoconductFONOPsand,instead,strengthenotherformsofcooperationwiththeUnitedStatesontheSouthChinaSeadisputes.
AnAustralianFONOPwouldrequireachangetoAustralia’smaritimeoperationsdoctrine.FONOPsarenotoneofthethirteenmaritimeoperationsidentifiedbytheRoyalAustralianNavy.
35
TheclosestAustralianoperationstotheFONOPsconductedbytheUSNavyarepresenceoperations.OperationGatewayisAustralia’smainprogramofpresenceoperationsinmaritimeSoutheastAsia.UnderAustralia’smaritimedoctrine,presenceoperationsareincludedinthenon-coercivecategoryofdiplomaticoperations.AnAustralianFONOPwouldbehardtoclassifyassuch.
POLICYBRIEF
13
AUSTRALIA’SSOUTHCHINASEACHALLENGES
AnyAustralianFONOPintheSouthChinaSeawouldlikelyfacegreateroperationalrisksandleadtogreaterpunitivereactionsfromChinathanUSoperationshave.In2019,ChinesefishingvesselsreportedlydirectedlaserbeamsatRoyalAustralianNavyhelicoptersduringIndo-PacificEndeavourpresenceoperationsfarfromanyChina-claimedlandfeaturesintheSouthChinaSea.
36
AnAustralianFONOPshouldexpecttofacegreateroperationalrisks,andChinacouldimposepunitivediplomaticandeconomicmeasuresonAustraliaofagreaterscalethanthosefacingthecountrycurrently.
ConductandpromotemorebilateralandminilateralmilitaryexerciseswithSoutheastAsianlittoralstatesintheSouthChinaSea
AustraliashouldinsteadparticipateinmoreandlargerbilateralandminilateralmilitaryexerciseswithSoutheastAsianlittoralstatesintheirrespectiveexclusiveeconomiczonesintheSouthChinaSea.TheseexerciseswoulddeependefencerelationswithSoutheastAsianlittoralstatesandsignalAustraliaandlittoralstates’oppositiontoChina’sCOCproposalforanotificationandrejectionmechanismforsuchexercises.
SoutheastAsianlittoralstatesaremoreactivelyparticipatinginexerciseswith‘non-regional’powers,ofwhichAustraliaisakeyexample.TheseexercisesincludeAustralia’snowregularparticipationintheannualUS–Philippinemulti-serviceBalikatanexercises;andtheAustralia–VietnamnavalexercisesduringAustralianDefen
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 营养障碍性疾病诊疗与护理考核试题及答案
- 油漆工安全操作规程
- 英语阅读训练调查及分析
- 优化有限空间作业的专项计划
- 智能交通行业中小企业劳动合同规范
- 电子商务平台保证金合同
- 草牧场承包权流转与农业现代化实施合同
- 出租自住合并方案
- 高速公路草料运输通行费优惠政策合同
- 消系统施工方案
- 脑卒中溶栓护理课件
- 2025年城建技师考试题库及答案
- 2025年中国LTCC技术行业市场现状、前景分析研究报告(智研咨询发布)
- 租赁住房培训课件下载
- 房管员试题资料
- 2025至2030中国扭蛋机行业市场发展现状及商业模式与投融资战略报告
- 2024年苏州昆山国创投资集团有限公司招聘笔试真题
- 商场吸烟区管理制度
- 2025年四川省成都市中考地理真题(原卷版)
- 糖尿病足截肢术后护理
- 广东省东莞市2022-2023学年高二下学期期末物理试题(含答案)
评论
0/150
提交评论