【双语阅读】Educationalsuccessamongchildrenofsimilarcognitiveability_第1页
【双语阅读】Educationalsuccessamongchildrenofsimilarcognitiveability_第2页
【双语阅读】Educationalsuccessamongchildrenofsimilarcognitiveability_第3页
【双语阅读】Educationalsuccessamongchildrenofsimilarcognitiveability_第4页
全文预览已结束

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

1、双语阅读Educational success among children of similar cognitive ability dep ends ontheir background背景决定儿童的教育成就by University of Oxford牛津大学Britain's got talent but we're still wasting it. That's the main finding of a new report by researchers from Oxford University p ublished today.英国有人才,但我们仍在

2、浪费人才。这是牛津大学研究人员今天发表的一份新报告的主要发现。Children of similar cognitive ability have very different chances of educational success; it still dep ends on their p arents' economic, sociocultural and educational resources.认知能力相似的儿童获得教育成功的机会却不同;这取决于他们父母的经济实力、社会文化和教育资源。This contradicts a commonly held view that

3、 these days that our education system has devel oped enough to give everyone a fighting chance.这与人们普遍持有的观点相矛盾,这种观点认为,如今我们的教育体系已经发展到足以给每个人一个奋斗的机会。The researchers, led by Dr. Erzs ebet Bukodi from Oxford's Department ofSocial P olicy and Intervention, looked at data from cohorts of children born i

4、n three decades: 1950s, 1970s and 1990s.牛津大学社会政策研究部门的Erzs doet Bukodi博士带领的研究人员,研究了出生在50年代、70年代和90年代三个时段的儿童的数据。They found significant evidence of a wastage of talent. Individuals with high levels of cognitive ability but who are disadvantaged in their social origins are p ersistently unable to transl

5、ate their ability into educational attainment to the same extent as their more advantaged counter parts.他们发现了人才流失的重要原因。具有高水平认知能力但在社会出身方面处于劣势的个体,始终无法与那些条件较好的人达到相同程度的教育成就。The research, funded by the Nuffield Foundation, found that only about half of the difference in educational attainment between chi

6、ldren from advantaged and disadvantaged p arental backgrounds is due to differences in their cognitive ability. The other half is due to other factors associated with their backgrounds.这项研究由美国纳菲尔德基金会协会资助,研究发现家境较好的孩子和家境困难的孩子在学历上的差异有一半是由于他们认知能力的差异。另一半则是与他们的家庭背景有关的其他因素。"If we compare the education

7、al attainment of children born in the 1990s to those in the late 1950s and early 1970s, we see that p arent's economic resources have become a less imp ortant factor, but their socio-cultural and educational resources have grown in significance," says Dr. Bukodi."Bukodi博士说:“如果我们把20世纪90

8、年代出生的孩子的学历与20世纪50年代末和70年代初出生的孩子进行比较,我们会发现父母的经济资源已经成为一个不那么重要的因素,但是他们的社会文化和教育资源已经变得越来越重要。"2 / 4双语阅读That means that your p arents' pl ace in society and their own level of education still play a big part in how well you may do.这意味着,你父母在社会中的地位和他们自己的教育水平,仍然在很大程度上决定着你的成就。These exp erts are now ca

9、lling for p olicy-makers to acknowledge that formal qualifications are only one channel for up ward mobility for high-ability individuals of disadvantaged backgrounds.这些专家现在呼吁政策制定者承认,正式的资格证书只是家境不好的知识分子向上提升的一个渠道。Dr. Bukodi says: "These findings show that there are limits to how far inequalities

10、of opp ortunity can be reduced through educational p olicy alone.Changes in educational p olicy aren't having the imp act we want."Bukodi博士说:"这些发现表明,仅仅通过教育政策就可以减少机会不平等的程度是有限的。教育政策的变化没有产生我们想要的影响。Apart from education, job training p rogrammes, pro motions or becoming self-e mpio yed in h

11、igher-level occ up ations are imp ortant channels for up ward mobility.除了教育外,职业培训计划、晋升或在较高职位自雇都是向上提升的重要途径。Bukodi co-authored a recent book on this issue with Dr. John Goldthor pe who commented that, "The real mobility p roblem is that up ward mobility is falling while downward mobility is rising.3 / 4双语阅读Bukodi最近与John Goldthorpe博士合著了一本关于这个问题的书,他评论说:"真正的流动性问题是,向上层流动性下降,而向下层流动性上升。Young people now face less favourable mobility prosp ects than their p arents or grand parents." If we

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论