2019年雅思考试巩固预测试题及答案_第1页
2019年雅思考试巩固预测试题及答案_第2页
2019年雅思考试巩固预测试题及答案_第3页
2019年雅思考试巩固预测试题及答案_第4页
2019年雅思考试巩固预测试题及答案_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩6页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

1、2019 年雅思考试巩固预测试题及答案Suns fickle heart may leave us cold25 January 2007From New Scientist Print Edition.Stuart Clark1 Theres a dimmer switch inside the sun that causes itsbrightness to rise and fall on timescales of around 100,000years - exactly the same period as between ice ages on Earth.So says a p

2、hysicist who has created a computer model of ourstars core.2 Robert Ehrlich of George Mason University in Fairfax,Virginia, modelled the effect of temperature fluctuations inthe suns interior. According to the standard view, thetemperature of the suns core is held constant by theopposing pressures o

3、f gravity and nuclear fusion. However,Ehrlich believed that slight variations should be possible.3 He took as his starting point the work of AttilaGrandpierre of the Konkoly Observatory of the HungarianAcademy of Sciences. In 2005, Grandpierre and a collaborator,G bor Ágoston, calculated that

4、 magnetic fields in thesuns core could produce small instabilities in the solarplasma. These instabilities would induce localisedoscillations in temperature.4 Ehrlichs model shows that whilst most of theseoscillations cancel each other out, some reinforce oneanother and become long-lived temperature

5、 variations. Thefavoured frequencies allow the suns core temperature tooscillate around its average temperature of 13.6 millionkelvin in cycles lasting either 100,000 or 41,000 years.Ehrlich says that random interactions within the sunsmagnetic field could flip the fluctuations from one cyclelength

6、to the other.5 These two timescales are instantly recognisable to anyonefamiliar with Earths ice ages : for the past million years,ice ages have occurred roughly every 100,000 years. Beforethat, they occurred roughly every 41,000 years.6 Most scientists believe that the ice ages are the result ofsub

7、tle changes in Earths orbit, known as the Milankovitchcycles. One such cycle describes the way Earths orbitgradually changes shape from a circle to a slight ellipse andback again roughly every 100,000 years. The theory says thisalters the amount of solar radiation that Earth receives,triggering the

8、ice ages. However, a persistent problem withthis theory has been its inability to explain why the iceages changed frequency a million years ago.7 In Milankovitch, there is certainly no good idea why thefrequency should change from one to another, says NeilEdwards, a climatologist at the Open Univers

9、ity in MiltonKeynes, UK. Nor is the transition problem the only one theMilankovitch theory faces. Ehrlich and other critics claimthat the temperature variations caused by Milankovitch cyclesare simply not big enough to drive ice ages.8 However, Edwards believes the small changes in solarheating prod

10、uced by Milankovitch cycles are then amplified byfeedback mechanisms on Earth. For example, if sea ice beginsto form because of a slight cooling, carbon dioxide thatwould otherwise have found its way into the atmosphere aspart of the carbon cycle is locked into the ice. That weakensthe greenhouse ef

11、fect and Earth grows even colder.9 According to Edwards, there is no lack of such mechanisms.If you add their effects together, there is more than enoughfeedback to make Milankovitch work, he says. The problemnow is identifying which mechanisms are at work. This is whyscientists like Edwards are not

12、 yet ready to give up on thecurrent theory. Milankovitch cycles give us ice ages roughlywhen we observe them to happen. We can calculate where we arein the cycle and compare it with observation, he says. Icant see any way of testing Ehrlichs idea to see where weare in the temperature oscillation.10

13、Ehrlich concedes this. If there is a way to test thistheory on the sun, I cant think of one that is practical,he says. Thats because variation over 41,000 to 100,000years is too gradual to be observed. However, there may be away to test it in other stars : red dwarfs. Their cores aremuch smaller tha

14、n that of the sun, and so Ehrlich believesthat the oscillation periods could be short enough to beobserved. He has yet to calculate the precise period or theextent of variation in brightness to be expected.11 Nigel Weiss, a solar physicist at the University ofCambridge, is far from convinced. He des

15、cribes Ehrlichsclaims as utterly implausible. Ehrlich counters thatWeisss opinion is based on the standard solar model, whichfails to take into account the magnetic instabilities thatcause the temperature fluctuations.(716 words)Questions 1-4Complete each of the following statements with One or Twon

16、ames of the scientists from the box below.Write the appropriate letters A-E in boxes 1-4 on your answersheet.A. Attila GrandpierreB. G bor ÁgostonC. Neil EdwardsD. Nigel WeissE. Robert Ehrlich1. .claims there 抯 a dimmer switch inside the sun thatcauses its brightness to rise and fall in perio

17、ds as long asthose between ice ages on Earth.2. .calculated that the internal solar magnetic fieldscould produce instabilities in the solar plasma.3. .holds that Milankovitch cycles can induce changes insolar heating on Earth and the changes are amplified on Earth.4. .doesnt believe in Ehrlichs view

18、points at all.Questions 5-9Do the following statements agree with the information givenin the reading passage?In boxes 5-9 on your answer sheet writeTRUE if the statement is true according to the passageFALSE if the statement is false according to the passageNOT GIVEN if the information is not given

19、 in the passage5. The ice ages changed frequency from 100,000 to 41,000years a million years ago.6. The sole problem that the Milankovitch theory can notsolve is to explain why the ice age frequency should shiftfrom one to another.7. Carbon dioxide can be locked artificially into sea ice toeliminate

20、 the greenhouse effect.8. Some scientists are not ready to give up the Milankovitchtheory though they havent figured out which mechanismsamplify the changes in solar heating.9. Both Edwards and Ehrlich believe that there is nopractical way to test when the solar temperature oscillationbegins and whe

21、n ends.Questions 10-14Complete the notes below.Choose one suitable word from the Reading Passage above foreach answer.Write your answers in boxes 10-14 on your answer sheet.The standard view assumes that the opposing pressures ofgravity and nuclear fusions hold the temperature .10.inthe suns interio

22、r, but the slight changes in theearths .11. alter the temperature on the earth and causeice ages every 100,000 years. A British scientist, however,challenges this view by claiming that the internal solarmagnetic .12. can induce the temperature oscillations inthe suns interior. The suns core temperat

23、ure oscillatesaround its average temperature in .13. lasting either100,000 or 41,000 years. And the .14. interactions withinthe suns magnetic field could flip the fluctuations from onecycle length to the other, which explains why the ice ageschanged frequency a million years ago.Answer keys and expl

24、anations :1. ESee the sentences in paragraph 1(Theres a dimmer switchinside the sun that causes its brightness to rise and fall ontimescales of around 100,000 years - exactly the same periodas between ice ages on Earth. So says a physicist who hascreated a computer model of our stars core.) and para

25、.2(Robert Ehrlich of George Mason University in Fairfax,Virginia, modelled the effect of temperature fluctuations inthe suns interior.)2. A BSee para.3 : ?i style=mso-bidi-font-style :normalGrandpierre and a collaborator, G bor Ágoston,calculated that magnetic fields in the suns core couldpro

26、duce small instabilities in the solar plasma.3. CSee para.8 : Edwards believes the small changes in solarheating produced by Milankovitch cycles are then amplified byfeedback mechanisms on Earth.4. DSee para.11 : Nigel Weiss, a solar physicist at theUniversity of Cambridge, is far from convinced. He

27、 describesEhrlichs claims as utterly implausible.5. FalseSee para.5 : for the past million years, ice ages haveoccurred roughly every 100,000 years. Before that, theyoccurred roughly every 41,000 years.6. FalseSee para.7 : In Milankovitch, there is certainly no goodidea why the frequency should chan

28、ge from one to another, .Nor is the transition problem the only one the Milankovitchtheory faces.7. Not GivenSee para.8 : if sea ice begins to form because of a slightcooling, carbon dioxide?is locked into the ice. That weakensthe greenhouse effect. (The passage doesn 抰 mention anythingabout locking

29、 Co2 into ice artificially.)8. TrueSee para.9 : there is no lack of such mechanisms. If you addtheir effects together, there is more than enough feedback tomake Milankovitch work,?The problem now is identifyingwhich mechanisms are at work. This is why scientists likeEdwards are not yet ready to give up on the current theory.9. TrueSee the sentences in para.9 (According to Edwards, 卙 e says.I cant see any way of testing Ehrlichs idea to see wherewe are in the temperature oscillation.) and para.10 (Ehrlichconcedes this. If there is a way to test this theor

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论