2021年德语系毕业论文范文

1、德语系毕业论文范文 一名因抢劫被拘留的嫌疑犯及 _会议 _想要在没有法律代表的状况下尽快进行采访。监管人员拒绝这一要求，而后一名律师被带到 _局。在审问过程中，为澄清被访谈者的报告，重复被提问的问题是非常必要的事情。而律师坚持这是不被允许的。然后采访稍事休息，重新开始时该律师宣读一份事先准备好的声明。 考虑上述段落并特别考虑到立法、 判例法及pa _实务守则，评论和批判性地评价在什么情况下可以对一名法律代表已被中止的嫌疑犯采访。其次，律师关于已经提出的问题不能重复的假设是否正确。第三，危险的辩护中提交预先准备好的声明。 以下情况下， _可以在未获得法律意见的情况下接受采访： 为了调查 _可在延

2、迟法律 _访问时接受采访的情况，首先必须探讨这种拖延必须满足的准则。 a suspect is in custody for robbery and the oic wants to interview him as soon as possible without legal representation. the custody offi _r declines this request and a solicitor is brought to the poli _ station. during questioning it became ne _ssary, in order to

3、clarify the interviewees aount, to pose questions which had already been asked. the solicitor argued that this is not permitted. there is then a break in the interview and when it is re-men _d the solicitor reads out a pre-prepared statement. consider the above paragraph and paying particular regard

4、 to legislation, case law and the pa _ codes of practi _ ment and critically evaluate under what circumstan _s can a suspect be interviewed when legal representation has been withheld. secondly whether the solicitor is correct in his assumption that questions which have already been posed cannot be

5、repeated. thirdly the dangers for the defen _ in submitting a pre-prepared statements. circumstan _s under which a suspect can be interviewed when aess to legal advi _ is withheld: in order to look into circumstan _s in which a suspect can be interviewed in the midst of delayed legal advi _ aess, th

6、e criteria which must be met to _ke this delay must first be explored. the relevant legislation which governs the delay of legal advi _ es from s.58 of the poli _ and criminal eviden _ act 1984(pa _), in particular part (6) of the section, which states; equally, a breach of s.58 pa _ does not always

7、 result in a quashed conviction. in r v alliadi _ 7 , the grounds for refusal of legal advi _ for an interview included the worry that the solicitor _y inadvertently warn other persons linked with the offen _. the appeal against conviction was refused, as although there was a poor decision on the part of the offi _r for delaying advi _, it was at the judges discretion to reverse the conviction. the judge decided against excluding the eviden _ under s.78 pa _, as the defendant was aware of his rights, exercised t